Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Incorporating a company allows a clear separation between the personal assets of shareholders and the company’s assets, granting the benefit of limited liability. However, this principle is not absolute. Under Ecuadorian corporate law, the doctrine of piercing

the corporate veil allows authorities or courts to disregard the legal personality of a company when it has been used improperly, fraudulently, or contrary to law.

This mechanism may apply when there is a commingling of personal and corporate assets, when the company is used to evade obligations toward creditors, or when the legal entity is used as a mere instrument to conceal unlawful conduct. In such circumstances, courts may determine that the company has functioned as a façade and extend liability directly to the shareholders or directors involved.

In recent years, this doctrine has gained relevance in commercial disputes, insolvency proceedings, and debt enforcement actions, where claimants seek to demonstrate that a company was used as a vehicle to avoid responsibility. There is an increasing tendency for authorities to examine the real conduct of corporate actors and the effective operation of the company beyond its formal structure.

In this context, it is essential for companies to maintain strong corporate governance practices, clear accounting separation, proper corporate records, and a strict distinction between personal and corporate assets. These measures enhance legal certainty and significantly reduce the risk of personal liability exposure.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we have extensive experience in corporate law and governance. We advise clients on risk prevention, corporate structuring, and representation in complex disputes involving shareholder and director liability.

Más Artículos

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

1 3 4 5 6 7 39