Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News
Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders
- February 26th, 2026
- Quevedo & Ponce
Incorporating a company allows a clear separation between the personal assets of shareholders and the company’s assets, granting the benefit of limited liability. However, this principle is not absolute. Under Ecuadorian corporate law, the doctrine of piercing
the corporate veil allows authorities or courts to disregard the legal personality of a company when it has been used improperly, fraudulently, or contrary to law.
This mechanism may apply when there is a commingling of personal and corporate assets, when the company is used to evade obligations toward creditors, or when the legal entity is used as a mere instrument to conceal unlawful conduct. In such circumstances, courts may determine that the company has functioned as a façade and extend liability directly to the shareholders or directors involved.
In recent years, this doctrine has gained relevance in commercial disputes, insolvency proceedings, and debt enforcement actions, where claimants seek to demonstrate that a company was used as a vehicle to avoid responsibility. There is an increasing tendency for authorities to examine the real conduct of corporate actors and the effective operation of the company beyond its formal structure.
In this context, it is essential for companies to maintain strong corporate governance practices, clear accounting separation, proper corporate records, and a strict distinction between personal and corporate assets. These measures enhance legal certainty and significantly reduce the risk of personal liability exposure.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we have extensive experience in corporate law and governance. We advise clients on risk prevention, corporate structuring, and representation in complex disputes involving shareholder and director liability.
Más Artículos
SENADI Resolution Strengthens the Control of Geographical Indications and Denominations of Origin in Ecuador
The National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI) issued Resolution No. SENADI-DG-2026-0009-RE on March 25, 2026, published in Official Registry Year II, First Supplement No. 251. This resolution establishes a new technical regulation for the creation and operation of regulatory offices for Geographical Indications (GIs) and Denominations of Origin (DOs) in the country.
Resolución SENADI fortalece el control de Indicaciones Geográficas y Denominaciones de Origen en Ecuador
El Servicio Nacional de Derechos Intelectuales (SENADI) emitió la Resolución Nro. SENADI-DG-2026-0009-RE el 25 de marzo de 2026, publicada en el Registro Oficial Año II, Primer Suplemento No. 251, mediante la cual se establece una nueva normativa técnica para la creación y funcionamiento de las oficinas reguladoras de Indicaciones Geográficas (IG) y Denominaciones de Origen (DO) en el país.
Can property lent under a commodatum agreement be acquired by prescription?
A commodatum is a contract through which a person lends property free of charge for another person to use, with the obligation to return it. Under the Ecuadorian legal system, the borrower does not acquire possession but only mere holding of the property, which means it cannot be acquired through acquisitive prescription unless a proven interversion of title occurs.
¿Puede prescribir un bien entregado en comodato?
El comodato es un contrato mediante el cual una persona entrega gratuitamente un bien para su uso, con la obligación de devolverlo. En nuestro sistema legal ecuatoriano, el comodatario no adquiere posesión sino mera tenencia, por lo que no puede adquirir el bien por prescripción adquisitiva, salvo que exista una intervención del título debidamente probada.
Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters
Proposing urgent economic bills is one of the powers of the Executive Function; however, these must be submitted to the National Assembly for approval, modification, or rejection. In accordance with the Constitution and the Organic Law of the Legislative Function, a failure to issue a ruling results in the immediate enactment of the project by operation of law.


