Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News
Can property lent under a commodatum agreement be acquired by prescription?
- March 12th, 2026
- Quevedo & Ponce
A commodatum is a contract commonly used in family, business, or trust-based relationships. It refers to the free loan of property for use, with the obligation to return it once the agreed time or purpose has been fulfilled.
The Ecuadorian Civil Code defines commodatum it’s Article 2077 as a contract through grants a non-fungible item to another for use it and later returned. This obligation to return the property is essential to understand why a good delivered under commodatum cannot be acquired through prescription.
For acquisitive prescription to apply, the law requires possession. Article 715 of the Civil Code states that possession means holding a thing with the intention of acting as its owner.
In a commodatum agreement, the borrower clearly recognizes that the property belongs to someone else and that the use is temporary. For this reason, the borrower is considered a mere holder, not a possessor.
Acquisitive prescription, regulated in Article 2392 of the Civil Code, allows a person to acquire ownership of property after possessing it for a certain period of time under specific conditions. However, because commodatum only creates holding and not possession, the borrower cannot acquire the property through prescription.
A commodatum agreement does not create possession that can lead to prescription. This situation would only change if there is an interversion of title, meaning that the holder begins to act as the owner and denies the rights of the real owner. This change must be clear and proven.
As long as the commodatum relationship continues and the borrower recognizes the owner’s rights, the passage of time will not allow the borrower to acquire the property through prescription.
Más Artículos
IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos
La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.
Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin
Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.
Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen
Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.
Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity
The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.
Transformación Societaria y Sociedades Anónimas Deportivas: Efectos de la sentencia constitucional que dejó sin vigencia la Ley Orgánica de Solidaridad Nacional
La Corte Constitucional del Ecuador declaró la inconstitucionalidad total de la Ley Orgánica de Solidaridad Nacional, al determinar que fue aprobada vulnerando el principio de unidad de materia y el procedimiento legislativo ordinario. Esta decisión deja sin efecto las obligaciones impuestas a las Sociedades por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) y a las Sociedades Anónimas Deportivas (S.A.D.), restableciendo el marco normativo previo y reafirmando la supremacía del control constitucional y la necesidad de mantener la coherencia normativa en el sistema jurídico ecuatoriano.
