Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News
What You Need to Know About Economic Concentrations in Ecuador
- August 19th, 2026
- Quevedo & Ponce
Mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions involving a change of control are common tools for business growth. However, when a transaction may significantly affect the structure of a market, it becomes relevant not only from a financial or corporate perspective but also from a Competition Law standpoint.
The Organic Law for the Regulation and Control of Market Power (LORCPM) establishes a framework for the control of economic concentrations. This regime covers, among other transactions, certain mergers, acquisitions, and transactions involving the direct or indirect acquisition of control or substantial influence over another economic operator.
When must a concentration be notified?
Not every transaction must be notified. Prior notification depends on whether the requirements established by law are met and whether the applicable notification thresholds are exceeded.
- One of these criteria is based on turnover. For economic operators subject to the general regime, notification is required when the total turnover in Ecuador of the parties involved exceeds 200,000 Unified Basic Salaries (RBU), without prejudice to the specific thresholds applicable to certain regulated sectors.
- The second criterion relates to market share. When the parties operate in the same economic activity, notification is required when, as a result of the transaction, a market share equal to or greater than 30% of the relevant market is acquired or increased, whether at the national level or within a defined geographic market in Ecuador.
What can the authority decide?
The Superintendence of Economic Competition (SCE) assesses the potential effects of the transaction on competition, considering factors such as the relevant market, market shares, barriers to entry, competitors, and potential effects on consumers and users.
The transaction may be:
- authorized,
- authorized subject to conditions,
- or prohibited.
Depending on the results of the analysis and its potential effects on competition.
Therefore, before closing an acquisition, companies should assess whether notification is required, verify the applicable thresholds, define the relevant market, and anticipate potential regulatory risks.
In an acquisition, the question is not only how much the target company is worth, but also what will happen to the market after the transaction.
Data Protection in Ecuador: Who Does It Apply To?
The LOPDP regulates how personal information is collected, used, stored, shared, and deleted, whether it is handled physically or digitally. Compliance is not simply a matter of publishing a privacy policy on a website; it requires incorporating data protection measures into the organization’s activities.
Protección de datos en Ecuador: ¿A quiénes aplica?
La Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) regula el tratamiento de datos personales en Ecuador, tanto en medios físicos como digitales. Su aplicación no se limita a las grandes empresas, sino que comprende a organizaciones y personas que tratan datos personales, como colegios, guarderías, clínicas, empleadores, instituciones financieras y negocios que utilizan sistemas de videovigilancia.
Are promises to enter into a contract binding on the parties?
Before signing a final contract, it is common to use letters of intent or promises to contract as part of the negotiation process. These tools protect the interests of all parties when executed in compliance with the law.
¿Las promesas de celebrar un contrato son obligatorias para las partes?
Antes de firmar un contrato definitivo, es común recurrir a acuerdos de intenciones o promesas de contratar como parte de las negociaciones. Estas figuras permiten proteger los intereses de las partes si se realizan en conformidad con la ley.
Use of Digital Avatars: An Appropriate Measure Against Organized Crime?
Through Resolution No. 164-2026, the Plenary of Ecuador’s Council of the Judiciary approved the Technical-Operational Protocol for the Use of Digital Avatars as a Security Measure in Remote Hearings, introducing a new technological tool intended to mitigate certain risks faced by judges and other judicial officers.
