Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?
- March 6th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The judge will declare the abandonment of the process if all parties have ceased to act for six months from the notification of the last providence that allowed progress in the case. Abandonment cannot be declared if the judge has pending documents to review. The timeframe for declaring abandonment begins the day after the last notification of the providence or, if applicable, the day after the last procedural act.
In which cases abandonment cannot be declared?
- In cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, the elderly, and other vulnerable groups.
- In cases affecting the labor rights of workers.
- In voluntary proceedings.
- In subjective contentious administrative actions.
- At the execution stage.
What is the effect of abandonment in a judicial process?
If it occurs for the first time in the first instance, the claimant may file a new claim after six months. If abandonment is declared a second time on the same claim, the right to sue will be lost. In the case of abandonment in the second instance or in cassation, the appeal will be deemed withdrawn, the resolution will be final, and documents will be returned to the relevant court.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we specialize in providing legal advice and effective representation in judicial proceedings, ensuring the protection of our clients’ rights at every stage of the process.
Más Artículos
IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions
Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20
IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos
La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.
Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin
Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.
Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen
Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.
Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity
The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.
