Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Dissolution, Liquidation, and Cancellation of Commercial Companies in Ecuador
- February 26th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
When a company ceases operations, generates no income, or becomes unprofitable, the most prudent course of action is to close it as soon as possible. This helps to avoid the accumulation of fiscal and administrative obligations with entities such as the Superintendency of Companies, Securities, and Insurance (SCVS) and the Internal Revenue Service (SRI), as well as reducing unnecessary expenses and minimizing the risk of fines or sanctions.
The closure may be necessary for various reasons, such as unsatisfactory results, conflicts among shareholders, lack of operations, or the personal decision to finish the project. The following are the options available perform out this procedure, each one suitable for different circumstances:
- Volontary and early dissolution: This procedure allows the shareholders to decide in advance to close the company. It involves the formal dissolution of the company, liquidation of assets and liabilities, and subsequent cancellation of registration.
- Expedited procedure for voluntary dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation request: If the company has no outstanding debts, this option offers a more agile process, allowing the dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation to be completed in a single administrative act.
- Expedited cancellation: In this case, if the company has no pending obligations and all shareholders agree, a fast and efficient cancellation can be conducted before the Commercial or Corporate Registry, as appropriate.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer comprehensive legal counsel for the dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation of companies. Our experts ensure an efficient process, in compliance with current regulations, tailored to meet the specific needs of each client.
Más Artículos
Economic Concentrations in Ecuador
Mergers, acquisitions, and transactions involving a change of control may be subject to Ecuador’s economic concentration control regime. The applicable rules establish specific thresholds to determine when a transaction must be notified in advance to the Superintendence of Economic Competition and allow the authority to authorize, condition, or prohibit a transaction depending on its effects on competition.
The right to remain unpublished and the posthumous publication of Gabriel García Márquez’s work “See You in August”
We all celebrate being able to read one more work by García Márquez, but what about respect for his copyright? The posthumous publication of “See You in August” has reignited the debate over the right to remain unpublished, an inalienable moral right that empowers creators to decide whether their work is released or remains unpublished. Although the Colombian Nobel laureate expressed his intention not to publish it during his lifetime, his heirs authorized its publication, raising an ethical and legal dilemma regarding the limits of rights heirs as custodians of the author’s original intent.
The UBS Case: When Having a Compliance System Does Not Mean Controlling Risk
UBS is one of the world’s largest financial groups. Headquartered in Switzerland, it provides private banking, wealth management, investment management and investment banking services. Its United States operations include UBS Financial Services Inc., a company that provides financial and investment services to clients.
Relevant Market in Ecuador Competition Law: How Is It Defined?
The relevant market is one of the fundamental concepts in Competition Law, as it defines the scope in which companies compete and helps determine whether a particular conduct may affect market competition. Its proper definition is essential for assessing anticompetitive practices, abuse of market power, and merger control
Implications of Personal Data Processing in Contractual Matters
In the Ecuadorian business environment, the inclusion of specific data protection clauses in contracts is not optional, but rather a legal obligation under the LOPDP, which prohibits the use of generic authorizations, to ensure that the processing of information is lawful and to avoid severe sanctions by the Superintendence of Personal Data Protection.
