Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Dissolution, Liquidation, and Cancellation of Commercial Companies in Ecuador

When a company ceases operations, generates no income, or becomes unprofitable, the most prudent course of action is to close it as soon as possible. This helps to avoid the accumulation of fiscal and administrative obligations with entities such as the Superintendency of Companies, Securities, and Insurance (SCVS) and the Internal Revenue Service (SRI), as well as reducing unnecessary expenses and minimizing the risk of fines or sanctions.

The closure may be necessary for various reasons, such as unsatisfactory results, conflicts among shareholders, lack of operations, or the personal decision to finish the project. The following are the options available perform out this procedure, each one suitable for different circumstances:

  1. Volontary and early dissolution: This procedure allows the shareholders to decide in advance to close the company. It involves the formal dissolution of the company, liquidation of assets and liabilities, and subsequent cancellation of registration.

  2. Expedited procedure for voluntary dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation request: If the company has no outstanding debts, this option offers a more agile process, allowing the dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation to be completed in a single administrative act.

  3. Expedited cancellation: In this case, if the company has no pending obligations and all shareholders agree, a fast and efficient cancellation can be conducted before the Commercial or Corporate Registry, as appropriate.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer comprehensive legal counsel for the dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation of companies. Our experts ensure an efficient process, in compliance with current regulations, tailored to meet the specific needs of each client.

Más Artículos

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

1 3 4 5 6 7 39