Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News
New Regulation on Communal and Savings Funds Strengthens Local Financing and Financial Inclusion
- July 31st, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The Financial Policy and Regulation Board of Ecuador has approved Resolution No. JPRF-F-2025-0154, through which the legal framework governing community savings and loan funds within the popular and solidarity financial sector is comprehensively reformed. This regulation aims to promote economic inclusion, ensure institutional transparency, and strengthen sustainable local financing, moinly in rural and urban-marginal areas.
Among the main provisions, it establishes that the funds must be constituted as legal entities and must obtain prior authorization from the Superintendency of Popular and Solidarity Economy (SEPS). Their operations will be limited to individuals with verifiable common purposes, such as members of a neighborhood, association, cooperative, or institution.
The regulation sets a maximum asset limit of USD 400,000 and restricts activities exclusively to savings and credit operations among members. It also explicitly prohibits the collection of public funds, the opening of more than one office, and mass advertising.
Additionally, the regulation mandates a public registry, internal policies on ethics, good governance, and anti-money laundering measures. Finally, it establishes a 12-month moratorium on the creation of new funds, authorizing only the ongoing regularization processes.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer specialized legal services to community organizations, rural associations, cooperative networks, and local development entities, providing guidance in the legal incorporation, regulatory compliance, and operational regularization of communal savings funds.
Our firm in Quito brings over five decades of experience in public financial law and a strong commitment to the advancement of inclusive, solidarity-based economic models.
Contact our team for a comprehensive legal assessment of your communal or solidarity-based savings fund.
Más Artículos
IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions
Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20
IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos
La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.
Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin
Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.
Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen
Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.
Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity
The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.
