Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Superintendence of Personal Data Protection Issues Opinion on the Use of Biometric Data for Attendance Control
- March 20th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The Superintendence of Personal Data Protection has issued an opinion on Inquiry 002-2025, referenced in Official Letter No. SPDP-IRD-2025-0031-O, regarding the processing of biometric data for labor attendance control.
The authority establishes that explicit consent is required for the processing of biometric data in labor attendance control, and for consent to be considered valid, it must be free, specific, informed, and unequivocal.
Consent must be free, without coercion or undue pressure, and free from vices such as force or real fear, like the fear of losing one’s job. It must be specific, limited to a concrete purpose, and without ambiguity regarding its scope. Additionally, it must be informed, ensuring that the data subject clearly understands the purposes and conditions of the data processing. Finally, it must be unequivocal, expressed clearly and without doubt, ensuring that the data subject’s will is consciously expressed.
Regarding the involved parties:
- Employers: They must ensure the consent of their workers before collecting biometric data and provide alternatives for those who do not wish to provide their data.
- Workers: They may refuse the processing of their biometric data without it affecting their employment conditions and may request the deletion of their biometric data when applicable.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect the rights to personal data security. Contact us for guidance on this important precedent and its impact in the labor field.
Más Artículos
Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry
The impact of fast fashion on the Ecuadorian intellectual property system, explaining which elements of fashion can be legally protected, which are not eligible for protection, and what the main challenges are for designers and brands when facing potential infringement.
El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa
El impacto del fast fashion en el sistema de propiedad intelectual ecuatoriano, explicando qué elementos de la moda pueden protegerse legalmente, cuáles no son susceptibles de protección y cuáles son los principales desafíos para diseñadores y marcas frente a posibles plagios.
Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders
Limited liability is one of the main advantages of incorporating a company. However, in Ecuador this protection is not absolute. Courts may apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and extend liability to shareholders or directors when the company has been misused. This has become increasingly relevant in commercial litigation and debt recovery cases.
Levantamiento del velo societario en Ecuador: cuándo la responsabilidad limitada deja de ser un escudo
La responsabilidad limitada es uno de los principales beneficios de constituir una compañía; sin embargo, en Ecuador no es absoluta. En determinados casos, los jueces pueden aplicar el levantamiento del velo societario y extender la responsabilidad a socios o administradores cuando se demuestra abuso de la personalidad jurídica. Este criterio cobra cada vez mayor relevancia en litigios mercantiles y de recuperación de cartera.
Nice Classification: Summary of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration
The Nice Classification constitutes the cornerstone of the international system used to organize goods and services for trademark registration purposes and is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The system divides goods and services into 45 classes and serves as the technical foundation for determining the scope of trademark protection. Its proper application is essential to ensure adequate protection and to avoid limitations or potential conflicts.
