Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

On October 8, 2025, the National Court of Justice issued Resolution No. 16-2025, by which it declared a binding jurisprudential precedent regarding the application of Article 216 of the Labor Code, related to employer retirement compensation. This resolution consolidates the uniform criterion sustained by the Specialized Labor Chamber in several rulings and has general and binding effects as of its publication in the Official Gazette on November 7, 2025.

This precedent arises from the Court’s repeated analysis of cases discussing the employer’s right to deduct certain amounts from the employer retirement fund. According to the Court’s interpretation, the employer may only deduct amounts corresponding to reserve funds, whether deposited in the Ecuadorian Social Security Institute (IESS) or directly paid to the employee. On the other hand, employer contributions to the IESS are not part of the employee’s individual retirement fund, as they constitute obligations of a different legal nature.

This distinction is based in Rule 1 of Article 216 of the Labor Code, which establishes that the individual fund used to calculate employer retirement compensation consists of two components: the reserve fund and an amount equivalent to five percent of the average annual remuneration received during the last five years, multiplied by the years of service. Based on this framework, the Court emphasizes that the deduction of reserve funds is the only one permitted, in observance of the principle of favorability provided in Article 326(3) of the Constitution, which establishes that the most favorable interpretation to the worker must always prevail.

The resolution strengthens the system of binding precedents in Ecuador, ensuring consistency in the application of labor law and reinforcing legal security, pursuant to Article 82 of the Constitution. From now, all courts and judges are required to observe this criterion when resolving disputes concerning employer retirement compensation, thereby guaranteeing equitable and predictable treatment in similar cases.

At Quevedo & Ponce, where Dr. Marcos Ponce—Specialist and Professor of Labor Law—has recently joined our team, to provide specialized advisory services to employers and employees, ensuring compliance with current regulations and proper management of employer obligations.

Más Artículos

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El impacto del fast fashion en el sistema de propiedad intelectual ecuatoriano, explicando qué elementos de la moda pueden protegerse legalmente, cuáles no son susceptibles de protección y cuáles son los principales desafíos para diseñadores y marcas frente a posibles plagios.

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Limited liability is one of the main advantages of incorporating a company. However, in Ecuador this protection is not absolute. Courts may apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and extend liability to shareholders or directors when the company has been misused. This has become increasingly relevant in commercial litigation and debt recovery cases.

Levantamiento del velo societario en Ecuador: cuándo la responsabilidad limitada deja de ser un escudo

Levantamiento del velo societario en Ecuador: cuándo la responsabilidad limitada deja de ser un escudo

La responsabilidad limitada es uno de los principales beneficios de constituir una compañía; sin embargo, en Ecuador no es absoluta. En determinados casos, los jueces pueden aplicar el levantamiento del velo societario y extender la responsabilidad a socios o administradores cuando se demuestra abuso de la personalidad jurídica. Este criterio cobra cada vez mayor relevancia en litigios mercantiles y de recuperación de cartera.

Nice Classification: Summary of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration

Nice Classification: Summary of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration

The Nice Classification constitutes the cornerstone of the international system used to organize goods and services for trademark registration purposes and is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The system divides goods and services into 45 classes and serves as the technical foundation for determining the scope of trademark protection. Its proper application is essential to ensure adequate protection and to avoid limitations or potential conflicts.

Clasificación de Niza: Resumen de Productos y Servicios para el Registro de Marcas

Clasificación de Niza: Resumen de Productos y Servicios para el Registro de Marcas

La Clasificación de Niza es el eje del sistema internacional utilizado para organizar los productos y servicios a efectos del registro de marcas, administrada por la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (OMPI). Este sistema divide los productos y servicios en 45 clases y constituye la base técnica que determina el alcance de la protección marcaria, siendo fundamental su correcta aplicación para garantizar una protección adecuada y evitar limitaciones o conflictos futuros.

1 2 3 4 5 6 41