Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

On October 8, 2025, the National Court of Justice issued Resolution No. 16-2025, by which it declared a binding jurisprudential precedent regarding the application of Article 216 of the Labor Code, related to employer retirement compensation. This resolution consolidates the uniform criterion sustained by the Specialized Labor Chamber in several rulings and has general and binding effects as of its publication in the Official Gazette on November 7, 2025.

This precedent arises from the Court’s repeated analysis of cases discussing the employer’s right to deduct certain amounts from the employer retirement fund. According to the Court’s interpretation, the employer may only deduct amounts corresponding to reserve funds, whether deposited in the Ecuadorian Social Security Institute (IESS) or directly paid to the employee. On the other hand, employer contributions to the IESS are not part of the employee’s individual retirement fund, as they constitute obligations of a different legal nature.

This distinction is based in Rule 1 of Article 216 of the Labor Code, which establishes that the individual fund used to calculate employer retirement compensation consists of two components: the reserve fund and an amount equivalent to five percent of the average annual remuneration received during the last five years, multiplied by the years of service. Based on this framework, the Court emphasizes that the deduction of reserve funds is the only one permitted, in observance of the principle of favorability provided in Article 326(3) of the Constitution, which establishes that the most favorable interpretation to the worker must always prevail.

The resolution strengthens the system of binding precedents in Ecuador, ensuring consistency in the application of labor law and reinforcing legal security, pursuant to Article 82 of the Constitution. From now, all courts and judges are required to observe this criterion when resolving disputes concerning employer retirement compensation, thereby guaranteeing equitable and predictable treatment in similar cases.

At Quevedo & Ponce, where Dr. Marcos Ponce—Specialist and Professor of Labor Law—has recently joined our team, to provide specialized advisory services to employers and employees, ensuring compliance with current regulations and proper management of employer obligations.

Más Artículos

Can property lent under a commodatum agreement be acquired by prescription?

Can property lent under a commodatum agreement be acquired by prescription?

A commodatum is a contract through which a person lends property free of charge for another person to use, with the obligation to return it. Under the Ecuadorian legal system, the borrower does not acquire possession but only mere holding of the property, which means it cannot be acquired through acquisitive prescription unless a proven interversion of title occurs.

¿Puede prescribir un bien entregado en comodato?

¿Puede prescribir un bien entregado en comodato?

El comodato es un contrato mediante el cual una persona entrega gratuitamente un bien para su uso, con la obligación de devolverlo. En nuestro sistema legal ecuatoriano, el comodatario no adquiere posesión sino mera tenencia, por lo que no puede adquirir el bien por prescripción adquisitiva, salvo que exista una intervención del título debidamente probada.

Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters

Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters

Proposing urgent economic bills is one of the powers of the Executive Function; however, these must be submitted to the National Assembly for approval, modification, or rejection. In accordance with the Constitution and the Organic Law of the Legislative Function, a failure to issue a ruling results in the immediate enactment of the project by operation of law.

Tratamiento de proyectos de ley calificados como urgentes en materia económica

Tratamiento de proyectos de ley calificados como urgentes en materia económica

Proponer proyectos de ley urgentes en materia económica es una de las facultades de la Función Ejecutiva, sin embargo, esto se debe remitir a la Asamblea Nacional para que se apruebe, modifique o niegue el proyecto. Conforme a la Constitución y la Ley Orgánica de la Función Legislativa, la falta de pronunciamiento da lugar a la vigencia inmediata del proyecto por ministerio de la ley.

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

The impact of fast fashion on the Ecuadorian intellectual property system, explaining which elements of fashion can be legally protected, which are not eligible for protection, and what the main challenges are for designers and brands when facing potential infringement.

1 2 3 39