Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News
What are allocations in inheritance law?
- April 16th 2026
- Quevedo & Ponce
First, we must understand that succession upon death is the only way to acquire an indeterminate universality, that is, all the assets, rights, and obligations that make up the heritage of the deceased person. Likewise, it must be taken into account that Article 1750 of the Civil Code expressly prohibits the transfer, for valuable consideration, of an indeterminate universality.
Article 995 defines assignments upon death as those made by a will or by law to give effect to the succession of the transferable assets, rights, and obligations of the deceased. Assignments are an essential part of the distribution of the heritage. These assignments may be, as mentioned, of two types:
- Singular assignments.
- Universal assignments.
Singular assignments or legacies
These occur when the deceased, through a will, disposes of a specific and individualized part of their estate, which is to be given to the beneficiary, who in this case is called a legatee. They arise only by will, never by operation of law.
Universal assignment
Through this, an indeterminate whole is assigned to a successor, which may include the entirety or a share of the deceased’s heritage. This type of assignment can occur by will and also by operation of law, in the absence of a will.
Let us remember: the deceased person is called the “causante,” whose succession opens precisely at the moment of death. The person who benefits from an assignment is generally called an “assignee” (asignatario). In turn, when the assignment is universal, the recipient is called an heir; and when it is singular, as indicated, they are called a legatee.
Thus, an assignee by universal title has the right to the entire heritage or a portion of it, in proportion to their share, while a legatee has the right to what has been specifically assigned to them in the will.
Making this distinction, together with other basic conceptual aspects, is essential for succession upon death to proceed without major complications.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we have experience in inheritance law, providing technical advice and comprehensive support to effectively our clients’ rights.
Más Artículos
Avoid Fines which rank from 2 to 20 Basic Salaries! – Gender Equality Plan for Companies in Ecuador
The Equality Plan must be registered before July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor, or fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries will be imposed on companies and public institutions that fail to comply with the law. This Plan ensures equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace, promoting inclusion and aiming to eliminate discrimination.
¡Evita multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos! – Plan de igualdad laboral para compañías
El Plan de Igualdad, debe registrarse antes del 31 de julio de 2025 ante el Ministerio del Trabajo, o se impondrán multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos a las compañías e instituciones públicas que no cumplan con la ley. Este Plan garantiza el mismo trato y oportunidades entre mujeres y hombres en el ámbito laboral, promoviendo la inclusión y buscando eliminar la discriminación.
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Marca “BIMBO” Rechazada en Suiza: La Importancia de las Percepciones Culturales en el Registro de Marcas
El impacto social de los términos en las marcas va más allá de lo legal. Un ejemplo reciente es el rechazo de la marca “BIMBO QSR” en Suiza, donde “Bimbo” se considera ofensivo en alemán. Este caso subraya la necesidad de evaluar las sensibilidades culturales al registrar una marca, especialmente para empresas con proyección internacional.
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.
