Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?

The judge will declare the abandonment of the process if all parties have ceased to act for six months from the notification of the last providence that allowed progress in the case. Abandonment cannot be declared if the judge has pending documents to review. The timeframe for declaring abandonment begins the day after the last notification of the providence or, if applicable, the day after the last procedural act.

In which cases abandonment cannot be declared?

  1. In cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, the elderly, and other vulnerable groups.
  2. In cases affecting the labor rights of workers.
  3. In voluntary proceedings.
  4. In subjective contentious administrative actions.
  5. At the execution stage.

What is the effect of abandonment in a judicial process?

If it occurs for the first time in the first instance, the claimant may file a new claim after six months. If abandonment is declared a second time on the same claim, the right to sue will be lost. In the case of abandonment in the second instance or in cassation, the appeal will be deemed withdrawn, the resolution will be final, and documents will be returned to the relevant court.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we specialize in providing legal advice and effective representation in judicial proceedings, ensuring the protection of our clients’ rights at every stage of the process.

Más Artículos

Digital Piracy in Ecuador: A Legal Challenge in the Technological Era

Digital Piracy in Ecuador: A Legal Challenge in the Technological Era

Digital piracy is one of the greatest challenges for the protection of intellectual property in Ecuador. The use of illegal platforms to distribute content without authorization infringes the rights of authors and creators while exposing users to legal and technological risks. Despite the existing legal framework, it is necessary to promote a digital culture that respects copyright.

Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024: Key Points and Challenges for Taxpayers

Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024: Key Points and Challenges for Taxpayers

On December 26, 2024, Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024 was enacted, modifying the patent tax and 1.5 tax on total assets. The regulation distinguishes obligations based on whether taxpayers are required to keep accounting records, and introduces benefits and exemptions in certain cases. It is essential to know these changes and deadlines to ensure compliance and optimize tax burdens. This article explains the key points that every taxpayer should know.

The Constitutional Court provisionally suspended articles from three recently approved laws

The Constitutional Court provisionally suspended articles from three recently approved laws

On August 4, the Constitutional Court announced the decisions adopted by the Admissions Chamber. Among them was the provisional suspension of a transitory provision of the Organic Law on Public Integrity, several articles and the regulations of the Organic Law on Intelligence, and certain articles of the Organic Law on National Solidarity.

New Rules for the Annulment of Electronic Tax Documents in Ecuador: Tax Implications for Taxpayers

New Rules for the Annulment of Electronic Tax Documents in Ecuador: Tax Implications for Taxpayers

Discover the key changes introduced by Resolution NAC-DGERCGC25-00000014 issued by the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service (SRI), effective as of August 1, 2025, which regulate the annulment of electronic tax documents in Ecuador. This analysis addresses the tax implications and legal challenges for companies operating under electronic invoicing schemes.

Intellectual Property, International Harmonization, and the Role of Customs: The Philco Case as a Warning for Export-Oriented Companies

Intellectual Property, International Harmonization, and the Role of Customs: The Philco Case as a Warning for Export-Oriented Companies

The use of trademarks in cross-border manufacturing operations poses significant legal risks, as evidenced by the Philco case in Brazil. This article analyzes how the unauthorized use of a trademark during manufacturing — even when the products are intended for export — may activate judicial and customs actions. Focusing the impact of the territoriality principle and the need for an international legal strategy.

1 4 5 6 7 8 15