Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
¡Evita multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos! - Plan de igualdad laboral para compañías
- February 20th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The Gender Equality Plan is a set of measures designed to ensure equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace. It must include clear actions, strategies, and practices that promote inclusion and eliminate discrimination, harassment (both workplace and sexual). Additionally, it must include a system of monitoring and evaluation to measure compliance with: gender-focused recruitment, the elimination of the gender pay gap, and the promotion of women to leadership positions.
Who must have a Plan?
- Mandatory: For all companies with more than 50 employees and for all public entities, regardless of the number of employees.
- Optional: For companies with fewer than 50 employees, although presenting the plan has advantages.
When must the Equality Plan be submitted?
The plan must be registered by July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor. After this date, the Ministry will conduct inspections and impose fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer a comprehensive Gender Equality Plan for private companies, ensuring compliance with the Ministry of Labor and the effective implementation of gender equality policies.
Our Gender Equality Plan offers:
- Detailed company diagnosis.
- Tailored solutions for the unique needs of each company.
- Formation of an Equality Committee.
- Definition of specific strategic axes, such as gender-focused recruitment, professional promotion, and harassment prevention.
Contact us!
Más Artículos
¡Evita multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos! – Plan de igualdad laboral para compañías
El Plan de Igualdad, debe registrarse antes del 31 de julio de 2025 ante el Ministerio del Trabajo, o se impondrán multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos a las compañías e instituciones públicas que no cumplan con la ley. Este Plan garantiza el mismo trato y oportunidades entre mujeres y hombres en el ámbito laboral, promoviendo la inclusión y buscando eliminar la discriminación.
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Marca “BIMBO” Rechazada en Suiza: La Importancia de las Percepciones Culturales en el Registro de Marcas
El impacto social de los términos en las marcas va más allá de lo legal. Un ejemplo reciente es el rechazo de la marca “BIMBO QSR” en Suiza, donde “Bimbo” se considera ofensivo en alemán. Este caso subraya la necesidad de evaluar las sensibilidades culturales al registrar una marca, especialmente para empresas con proyección internacional.
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.
Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI
Quevedo & Ponce actuó exitosamente en representación del Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, ante una demanda presentada por una compañía ecuatoriana, en que se alegó principalmente que FONTINA no estaba registrada en Ecuador. Sin embargo, el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo con Sede en el Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, ratificó el acto administrativo impugnado, citando el riesgo de confusión para el consumidor y aplicando la Decisión 486 de la Comunidad Andina, destacando la importancia de proteger las denominaciones de origen, incluso sin un registro formal en Ecuador.
