Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
- February 18th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Is it possible for a common term to be perceived as offensive?
The answer is yes. A clear example is the case of the “Bimbo” brand. In May 2024, the Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland rejected the registration of the “BIMBO QSR” trademark, considering that “Bimbo” is offensive in German. Although the Bimbo Group appealed, the Federal Court upheld the decision in November 2024, emphasizing how cultural perception influences trademark registration.
How is it decided whether a trademark is immoral or not?
The decision depends not only on local legislation but also on the social and cultural context of each region. In Switzerland, sensitivity towards potentially offensive terms has been crucial in rejecting trademarks, with the goal of protecting human dignity and preventing the perpetuation of prejudices.
This case highlights the importance of carefully analyzing the cultural impact of trademarks before registration, a fundamental lesson for companies seeking to expand internationally.
With extensive experience in the field, Quevedo & Ponce provides specialized legal advice, ensuring that registered trademarks comply not only with legal standards but also with the social values prevailing in our society.
Más Artículos
Norma Técnica para la Inscripción de Contratos de Cesión de derechos de autor y Licencia de Uso
El Servicio Nacional de Derechos Intelectuales (SENADI) expidió la Norma Técnica para la Inscripción de Contratos de Cesión de Derechos Patrimoniales de Derecho de Autor y Contratos de Licencia. Esta normativa, establecida mediante la Resolución No. SENADI-DNDAYDC-2025-0002-NT.
Calling general meetings by email: A method in effect since 2022
Since 2022, the General Meeting Regulations allow shareholders to be called by email, facilitating participation, reducing costs, and adapting to the digital age. Learn how this change optimizes the process and what to do if your bylaws require call-to-meetings by press.
Convocatorias a Juntas Generales por correo electrónico: Una modalidad en vigencia desde 2022
Desde 2022, el Reglamento de Juntas Generales permite convocar a los accionistas por correo electrónico, facilitando la participación, reduciendo costos y adaptándose a la era digital. Conoce cómo este cambio optimiza el proceso y qué hacer si tu estatuto exige convocatorias por prensa.
The Superintendence of Companies, through Resolution No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 dated March 7, 2025, has introduced an important reform to the “Regulation on General Meetings or General Assembly of Partners and Shareholders”
The Superintendence of Companies amended the “Regulations on General Meetings or General Assembly of Partners and Shareholders” through Resolution No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 of March 7, 2025, and established the possibility for partners and shareholders to choose to attend general meetings in person or virtually.
La Superintendencia de Compañías, mediante la Resolución No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 del 7 de marzo de 2025, reformó el “Reglamento sobre Juntas Generales o Asamblea General de Socios y Accionistas”
La Superintendencia de Compañías, reformó el “Reglamento sobre Juntas Generales o Asamblea General de Socios y Accionistas”, mediante la Resolución No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 del 7 de marzo de 2025, y estableció la posibilidad de que los socios y accionistas elijan asistir a las juntas generales de manera presencial o virtual.