Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The Constitutional Court guarantees the right to maternity leave even in the event of the newborn's death

On September 4, 2018, a woman gave birth via cesarean section and was granted maternity leave until November 26. Following the death of her child on September 16, officials from the Judiciary Council requested that she justify her absence with a leave for domestic calamity, even though her original medical certificate remained valid. Despite her insistence that she had the right to maintain her maternity leave under the LOSEP Regulations, she was informed that such right was extinguished by the death of the baby, according to an interpretation of the Organic Law of the Judicial Function. As a result, the National Directorate of Human Talent decided to suspend her leave, prompting the claimant to file a lawsuit for violation of her rights to maternity protection, health, care, and equality, as her need for physical and emotional recovery after childbirth and the loss of her child had not been recognized.

In response, the Court raised the following question:


Did the decision of the Provincial Directorate of Ibarra to refer for consultation the validity of the maternity leave violate the claimant’s right to protection as a woman in a period of maternity?

The Constitution of Ecuador recognizes pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding women as a priority group, guaranteeing their health and recovery. Both national and international regulations (CEDAW and the Constitution) establish that the right to health includes not only the absence of illness but also comprehensive well-being, which is especially important for women undergoing postpartum recovery or grieving a neonatal loss. CEDAW also requires that maternity leave be respected without affecting employment or benefits. The Court acknowledged that, although there may be normative ambiguity between the COFJ and the LOSEP Regulation, such consultation does not justify suspending the exercise of a fundamental right.

As a result, the Court determined that the claimant’s rights to priority protection, health, and dignified postpartum recovery were violated, and urged public institutions to refrain from repeating such practices.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.

Más Artículos

¿Qué tan útil puede resultar el otorgamiento de un testamento?

¿Qué tan útil puede resultar el otorgamiento de un testamento?

Reducción gradual del Impuesto a la Salida de Divisas (ISD) en Ecuador: Nuevas tarifas y fechas clave para el 2022.

20 Cambios fundamentales de la ley reformatoria del COGEP​

20 Cambios fundamentales de la ley reformatoria del COGEP​

Reformas Legales Impactantes: Cambios Clave en el Proceso Legal

10 cosas para tener en cuenta al contratar un trabajador a tiempo parcial

10 cosas para tener en cuenta al contratar un trabajador a tiempo parcial

Flexibilidad laboral con el Acuerdo Ministerial 135: Contratos parciales, jornadas y condiciones laborales claras para empleados públicos y privados.

1 20 21 22

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos