Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The Constitutional Court guarantees the right to maternity leave even in the event of the newborn's death

On September 4, 2018, a woman gave birth via cesarean section and was granted maternity leave until November 26. Following the death of her child on September 16, officials from the Judiciary Council requested that she justify her absence with a leave for domestic calamity, even though her original medical certificate remained valid. Despite her insistence that she had the right to maintain her maternity leave under the LOSEP Regulations, she was informed that such right was extinguished by the death of the baby, according to an interpretation of the Organic Law of the Judicial Function. As a result, the National Directorate of Human Talent decided to suspend her leave, prompting the claimant to file a lawsuit for violation of her rights to maternity protection, health, care, and equality, as her need for physical and emotional recovery after childbirth and the loss of her child had not been recognized.

In response, the Court raised the following question:


Did the decision of the Provincial Directorate of Ibarra to refer for consultation the validity of the maternity leave violate the claimant’s right to protection as a woman in a period of maternity?

The Constitution of Ecuador recognizes pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding women as a priority group, guaranteeing their health and recovery. Both national and international regulations (CEDAW and the Constitution) establish that the right to health includes not only the absence of illness but also comprehensive well-being, which is especially important for women undergoing postpartum recovery or grieving a neonatal loss. CEDAW also requires that maternity leave be respected without affecting employment or benefits. The Court acknowledged that, although there may be normative ambiguity between the COFJ and the LOSEP Regulation, such consultation does not justify suspending the exercise of a fundamental right.

As a result, the Court determined that the claimant’s rights to priority protection, health, and dignified postpartum recovery were violated, and urged public institutions to refrain from repeating such practices.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.

Más Artículos

Promoting the Economy of Entrepreneurs Women in Ecuador: A Key Legal Advancement

Promoting the Economy of Entrepreneurs Women in Ecuador: A Key Legal Advancement

The Organic Law to Promote the Economy of Entrepreneurs Women, published on March 10, 2025, promotes access to financial resources, training, and opportunities for entrepreneur’s women, seeking to reduce gender gaps in the economic and business sectors.

Impulso a la Economía de las Mujeres Emprendedoras en Ecuador: Un Avance Legal Clave

Impulso a la Economía de las Mujeres Emprendedoras en Ecuador: Un Avance Legal Clave

La Ley Orgánica para Impulsar la Economía de las Mujeres Emprendedoras del Ecuador, publicada el 10 de marzo de 2025, promueve el acceso a recursos financieros, capacitación y oportunidades para las mujeres emprendedoras, buscando reducir las brechas de género en el ámbito económico y empresarial.

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, declared article 19 of the Humanitarian Support Law partially unconstitutional, which allowed the unilateral termination of the emerging contract without compensation. Despite this, the contract remains valid, but the employer must compensate if the contract ends before the agreed period.

El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional

El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional

La Corte Constitucional, mediante sentencia 49-20-IN/25, declaró parcialmente inconstitucional el artículo 19 de la Ley de Apoyo Humanitario, que permitía la terminación unilateral del contrato emergente sin indemnización. A pesar de esto, el contrato sigue vigente, pero el empleador deberá indemnizar si termina el contrato antes del plazo acordado.

Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?

Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?

Abandonment in judicial proceedings is declared when the parties fail to act for six months following the last providence, except in cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, and labor rights. If declared for the first time, the claimant may file a new claim after six months; if it occurs again, the right to sue is extinguished.

1 21 22 23 24 25 39