Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Creation of Judicial Units Specialized in Constitutional Matters
- February 5th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
On April 21, 2024, a national referendum took place, where the question outlined in ballot box “C,” which was approved, stated: “Do you agree with the establishment of specialized judicial bodies in constitutional matters at both first and second instance levels for the adjudication of corresponding jurisdictional guarantees, amending the Constitution and reforming the Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control, according to Annex 2?” In response, the Council of the Judiciary, exercising its administrative powers, ordered the creation of these units and chambers through Plenary Resolution No. 006-2025.
What does the creation of these new judicial units entail?
These units will have jurisdiction over cases involving constitutional guarantees, except for the Extraordinary Action of Protection and the Action For Non-Compliance, which will continue to be adjudicated by the Constitutional Court. Hence, the new units will handle and resolve matters regarding Habeas Corpus, Habeas Data, Access to Public Information, Action Of Non-Compliance, and Action of Protection, provided that the respective rights violations have occurred or have effects in the jurisdiction of each Unit or Chamber.
Where will the specialized units in constitutional matters be located?
The resolution outlines the territorial distribution as follows:
Specialized Judicial Units (First Instance):
- Located in Quito, Pichincha Province.
- Located in Machala, El Oro Province.
- Located in Babahoyo, Los Ríos Province.
- Located in Portoviejo, Manabí Province.
- Located in Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, Galápagos Province.
Specialized District Judicial Units (First Instance):
- Located in Cuenca, Azuay Province (Competent for Azuay, Cañar, and Morona Santiago Provinces).
- Located in Ambato, Tungurahua Province (Competent for Tungurahua, Bolívar, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, and Pastaza Provinces).
- Located in Guayaquil, Guayas Province (Competent for Guayas and Santa Elena Provinces).
- Located in Ibarra, Imbabura Province (Competent for Imbabura and Carchi Provinces).
- Located in Loja, Loja Province (Competent for Loja and Zamora Chinchipe Provinces).
- Located in Francisco de Orellana, Orellana Province (Competent for Orellana, Napo, and Sucumbíos Provinces).
- Located in Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas Province (Competent for Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas and Esmeraldas Provinces).
Specialized District Chambers (Second Instance):
- Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Azuay, with jurisdiction over Azuay, Cañar, El Oro, Loja, Morona Santiago, and Zamora Chinchipe Provinces.
- Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Tungurahua, with jurisdiction over Tungurahua, Bolívar, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, and Pastaza Provinces.
- Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Guayas, with jurisdiction over Guayas, Galápagos, Los Ríos, and Santa Elena Provinces.
- Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, with jurisdiction over Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Esmeraldas, and Manabí Provinces.
- Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Pichincha, with jurisdiction over Pichincha, Carchi, Imbabura, Napo, Orellana, and Sucumbíos Provinces.
For matters involving personal jurisdiction, the National Court of Justice could act as the second instance, or otherwise, the President of this Court would act in such cases as dictated by law.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we recognize the profound importance of protecting fundamental rights at all times and advise our clients accordingly. Contact us to learn more about our legal services and our practice in constitutional law.
Más Artículos
The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court
The Constitutional Court, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, declared article 19 of the Humanitarian Support Law partially unconstitutional, which allowed the unilateral termination of the emerging contract without compensation. Despite this, the contract remains valid, but the employer must compensate if the contract ends before the agreed period.
El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional
La Corte Constitucional, mediante sentencia 49-20-IN/25, declaró parcialmente inconstitucional el artículo 19 de la Ley de Apoyo Humanitario, que permitía la terminación unilateral del contrato emergente sin indemnización. A pesar de esto, el contrato sigue vigente, pero el empleador deberá indemnizar si termina el contrato antes del plazo acordado.
Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?
Abandonment in judicial proceedings is declared when the parties fail to act for six months following the last providence, except in cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, and labor rights. If declared for the first time, the claimant may file a new claim after six months; if it occurs again, the right to sue is extinguished.
El abandono en los procesos judiciales: ¿El fin de un derecho?
El abandono en los procesos judiciales se declara cuando las partes no actúan durante seis meses tras la última providencia, salvo en casos de derechos de niños, personas con discapacidad y derechos laborales. Si se declara por primera vez, el demandante puede presentar una nueva demanda tras seis meses; si ocurre nuevamente, se extingue el derecho a demandar.
WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge
The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge, adopted in 2024, establishes an international framework for the protection and recognition of ancestral knowledge. Through innovations such as the disclosure requirement, it promotes transparency in the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge in patented inventions, ensuring respect for the communities of origin.
