Skip to main content

Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Creation of Judicial Units Specialized in Constitutional Matters

On April 21, 2024, a national referendum took place, where the question outlined in ballot box “C,” which was approved, stated: “Do you agree with the establishment of specialized judicial bodies in constitutional matters at both first and second instance levels for the adjudication of corresponding jurisdictional guarantees, amending the Constitution and reforming the Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control, according to Annex 2?” In response, the Council of the Judiciary, exercising its administrative powers, ordered the creation of these units and chambers through Plenary Resolution No. 006-2025.

What does the creation of these new judicial units entail?

These units will have jurisdiction over cases involving constitutional guarantees, except for the Extraordinary Action of Protection and the Action For Non-Compliance, which will continue to be adjudicated by the Constitutional Court. Hence, the new units will handle and resolve matters regarding Habeas Corpus, Habeas Data, Access to Public Information, Action Of Non-Compliance, and Action of Protection, provided that the respective rights violations have occurred or have effects in the jurisdiction of each Unit or Chamber.

Where will the specialized units in constitutional matters be located?

The resolution outlines the territorial distribution as follows:

Specialized Judicial Units (First Instance):

  • Located in Quito, Pichincha Province.
  • Located in Machala, El Oro Province.
  • Located in Babahoyo, Los Ríos Province.
  • Located in Portoviejo, Manabí Province.
  • Located in Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, Galápagos Province.

Specialized District Judicial Units (First Instance):

  • Located in Cuenca, Azuay Province (Competent for Azuay, Cañar, and Morona Santiago Provinces).
  • Located in Ambato, Tungurahua Province (Competent for Tungurahua, Bolívar, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, and Pastaza Provinces).
  • Located in Guayaquil, Guayas Province (Competent for Guayas and Santa Elena Provinces).
  • Located in Ibarra, Imbabura Province (Competent for Imbabura and Carchi Provinces).
  • Located in Loja, Loja Province (Competent for Loja and Zamora Chinchipe Provinces).
  • Located in Francisco de Orellana, Orellana Province (Competent for Orellana, Napo, and Sucumbíos Provinces).
  • Located in Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas Province (Competent for Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas and Esmeraldas Provinces).

Specialized District Chambers (Second Instance):

  • Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Azuay, with jurisdiction over Azuay, Cañar, El Oro, Loja, Morona Santiago, and Zamora Chinchipe Provinces.
  • Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Tungurahua, with jurisdiction over Tungurahua, Bolívar, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, and Pastaza Provinces.
  • Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Guayas, with jurisdiction over Guayas, Galápagos, Los Ríos, and Santa Elena Provinces.
  • Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, with jurisdiction over Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Esmeraldas, and Manabí Provinces.
  • Of the Provincial Court of Justice of Pichincha, with jurisdiction over Pichincha, Carchi, Imbabura, Napo, Orellana, and Sucumbíos Provinces.

For matters involving personal jurisdiction, the National Court of Justice could act as the second instance, or otherwise, the President of this Court would act in such cases as dictated by law.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we recognize the profound importance of protecting fundamental rights at all times and advise our clients accordingly. Contact us to learn more about our legal services and our practice in constitutional law.

Más Artículos

Digital Piracy in Ecuador: A Legal Challenge in the Technological Era

Digital Piracy in Ecuador: A Legal Challenge in the Technological Era

Digital piracy is one of the greatest challenges for the protection of intellectual property in Ecuador. The use of illegal platforms to distribute content without authorization infringes the rights of authors and creators while exposing users to legal and technological risks. Despite the existing legal framework, it is necessary to promote a digital culture that respects copyright.

Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024: Key Points and Challenges for Taxpayers

Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024: Key Points and Challenges for Taxpayers

On December 26, 2024, Metropolitan Ordinance No. 086-2024 was enacted, modifying the patent tax and 1.5 tax on total assets. The regulation distinguishes obligations based on whether taxpayers are required to keep accounting records, and introduces benefits and exemptions in certain cases. It is essential to know these changes and deadlines to ensure compliance and optimize tax burdens. This article explains the key points that every taxpayer should know.

The Constitutional Court provisionally suspended articles from three recently approved laws

The Constitutional Court provisionally suspended articles from three recently approved laws

On August 4, the Constitutional Court announced the decisions adopted by the Admissions Chamber. Among them was the provisional suspension of a transitory provision of the Organic Law on Public Integrity, several articles and the regulations of the Organic Law on Intelligence, and certain articles of the Organic Law on National Solidarity.

New Rules for the Annulment of Electronic Tax Documents in Ecuador: Tax Implications for Taxpayers

New Rules for the Annulment of Electronic Tax Documents in Ecuador: Tax Implications for Taxpayers

Discover the key changes introduced by Resolution NAC-DGERCGC25-00000014 issued by the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service (SRI), effective as of August 1, 2025, which regulate the annulment of electronic tax documents in Ecuador. This analysis addresses the tax implications and legal challenges for companies operating under electronic invoicing schemes.

Intellectual Property, International Harmonization, and the Role of Customs: The Philco Case as a Warning for Export-Oriented Companies

Intellectual Property, International Harmonization, and the Role of Customs: The Philco Case as a Warning for Export-Oriented Companies

The use of trademarks in cross-border manufacturing operations poses significant legal risks, as evidenced by the Philco case in Brazil. This article analyzes how the unauthorized use of a trademark during manufacturing — even when the products are intended for export — may activate judicial and customs actions. Focusing the impact of the territoriality principle and the need for an international legal strategy.

1 5 6 7 8 9 16