Quevedo & Ponce

Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

¡Evita multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos! - Plan de igualdad laboral para compañías

The Gender Equality Plan is a set of measures designed to ensure equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace. It must include clear actions, strategies, and practices that promote inclusion and eliminate discrimination, harassment (both workplace and sexual). Additionally, it must include a system of monitoring and evaluation to measure compliance with: gender-focused recruitment, the elimination of the gender pay gap, and the promotion of women to leadership positions.

Who must have a Plan?

  • Mandatory: For all companies with more than 50 employees and for all public entities, regardless of the number of employees.
  • Optional: For companies with fewer than 50 employees, although presenting the plan has advantages.


When must the Equality Plan be submitted?

The plan must be registered by July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor. After this date, the Ministry will conduct inspections and impose fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer a comprehensive Gender Equality Plan for private companies, ensuring compliance with the Ministry of Labor and the effective implementation of gender equality policies.

Our Gender Equality Plan offers:

  • Detailed company diagnosis.
  • Tailored solutions for the unique needs of each company.
  • Formation of an Equality Committee.
  • Definition of specific strategic axes, such as gender-focused recruitment, professional promotion, and harassment prevention.

Contact us!

Más Artículos

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

1 3 4 5 6 7 39