Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Ecuador and the Netherlands Strengthen customs control and Intellectual Property protection
- July 1st, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
On June 19, 2025, the Second Supplement of the Official Register No. 63 formalized the publication of the Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Ecuador on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Customs Matters.
This agreement marks a key milestone in bilateral cooperation aimed at preventing, detecting, and investigating customs violations, including smuggling, commercial fraud, and the counterfeiting of products protected by intellectual property rights. It establishes effective collaboration mechanisms between the customs authorities of both countries, including:
- Exchange of strategic and operational information.
- Notification of documents and administrative rulings.
- Coordinated surveillance of goods, means of transport, and individuals under suspicion.
- Mutual assistance in specific customs investigations.
Moreover, the agreement strengthens the implementation of border measures in line with international standards, safeguarding trademarks, copyrights, and industrial designs from infringement through counterfeit or pirated goods. It also provides for stricter controls, particularly for goods in transit or intended for export or import between both jurisdictions.
The agreement ensures the confidentiality and lawful use of shared information, respecting the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality.
This development has a direct impact on customs control authorities, foreign trade operators, and holders of intellectual property rights, all of whom will benefit from enhanced international coordination to combat piracy, counterfeiting, and other cross-border crimes.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we provide comprehensive legal counsel in the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, legal actions for infringement or counterfeiting, implementation of border measures before SENADI and the Ecuadorian Customs Service (SENAE).
Más Artículos
How to ensure a clear, valid, and proper property transfer
The purchase and sale of real estate in Ecuador is a legal act that requires document verification, compliance of notarial requirements, and registration before the Property Registry. This process demands a review of the property’s legal status and the involvement of a specialized attorney to ensure a valid, secure, and properly executed transfer of ownership.
Cómo asegurar una compraventa clara, válida y correcta
La compraventa de inmuebles en Ecuador es un acto jurídico que exige verificación documental, cumplimiento de requisitos notariales e inscripción en el Registro de la Propiedad. Este proceso requiere una revisión del estado legal del inmueble y la intervención de un abogado especializado para garantizar una transferencia de dominio válida, segura y correcta.
The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation
The National Court of Justice has issued a new binding jurisprudential precedent that redefines the calculation of employer retirement compensation in Ecuador. Resolution No. 16-2025 specifies which amounts may be deducted from the employee’s individual retirement fund, reinforcing the principle of favorability and legal security in labor matters.
La Corte Nacional de Justicia establece un nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio sobre jubilación patronal
La Corte Nacional de Justicia ha emitido un nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio que redefine el cálculo de la jubilación patronal en el Ecuador. La Resolución No. 16-2025 precisa qué valores pueden descontarse del haber individual del trabajador, reforzando el principio de favorabilidad y la seguridad jurídica en materia laboral
IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions
Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20
