Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
The notification of disability to the employer is not a requirement for special compensation in the event of an unjustified dismissal: Binding judicial precedent in Ecuador
- January 21, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
Resolution No. 001-2025 of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador strengthens the protection of labor rights for workers with disabilities or those responsible for individuals with disabilities in the case of unjustified dismissal.
Labor judges and courts are no longer required to verify whether the employer was notified of the worker’s disability or if the worker is registered as a substitute in order to order the payment of the special severance pay provided for in Article 51 of the Organic Disability Law. This regulation refers to the right to compensation equivalent to 18 monthly salaries, calculated based on the highest salary the worker received, in cases of unjustified dismissal.
Key points of the resolution:
No prior notification to the employer required: It is no longer necessary for the employer to have been notified about the worker’s disability or for the worker to be registered as a substitute to request the severance pay.
Only applicable requirements:
– There must be an unjustified dismissal.
– The worker must have a disability or be responsible for someone with a disability.
Protection for workers with disabilities:
This precedent applies to individuals with disabilities, defined as those with permanent limitations in performing essential daily life activities due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments, as outlined in the Regulation of the Organic Disability Law.
Implications of the ruling:
- For workers: Their right to request special severance pay in the case of unjustified dismissal is strengthened, simplifying the legal process.
- For employers: The ruling imposes greater responsibility on managing employee information and complying with labor regulations.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.
Más Artículos
SENADI Resolution Strengthens the Control of Geographical Indications and Denominations of Origin in Ecuador
The National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI) issued Resolution No. SENADI-DG-2026-0009-RE on March 25, 2026, published in Official Registry Year II, First Supplement No. 251. This resolution establishes a new technical regulation for the creation and operation of regulatory offices for Geographical Indications (GIs) and Denominations of Origin (DOs) in the country.
Can property lent under a commodatum agreement be acquired by prescription?
A commodatum is a contract through which a person lends property free of charge for another person to use, with the obligation to return it. Under the Ecuadorian legal system, the borrower does not acquire possession but only mere holding of the property, which means it cannot be acquired through acquisitive prescription unless a proven interversion of title occurs.
Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters
Proposing urgent economic bills is one of the powers of the Executive Function; however, these must be submitted to the National Assembly for approval, modification, or rejection. In accordance with the Constitution and the Organic Law of the Legislative Function, a failure to issue a ruling results in the immediate enactment of the project by operation of law.
Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry
The impact of fast fashion on the Ecuadorian intellectual property system, explaining which elements of fashion can be legally protected, which are not eligible for protection, and what the main challenges are for designers and brands when facing potential infringement.
Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders
Limited liability is one of the main advantages of incorporating a company. However, in Ecuador this protection is not absolute. Courts may apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and extend liability to shareholders or directors when the company has been misused. This has become increasingly relevant in commercial litigation and debt recovery cases.
