Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
The Frisby Case: A Key Lesson in International Trademark Protection
- May 21st, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
One of Colombia’s most popular fast-food chains, Frisby, is currently facing a complex legal dispute in Europe that has captured the attention of businesses, the media, and the general public. The conflict arose when a company established in Spain by third parties began using the name “Frisby” and a visual identity strikingly similar to that of the Colombian brand, creating clear confusion in the market.
Although Frisby has held trademark registrations in both the European Union and Spain for over 20 years, it was caught off guard by the unauthorized use of its trade name and distinctive elements by a third-party company in Spanish territory. Despite having registered rights, the lack of effective and sustained use of the mark in that jurisdiction created a legal gap, now being exploited by others attempting to take advantage of the intangible value the brand represents.
This case highlights a reality we, as intellectual property attorneys, regularly emphasize: registering a trademark is not enough to ensure its protection. It is essential to demonstrate real, continuous, and provable use—especially in the jurisdictions where exclusive rights are to be maintained.
Drawing from our experience as a law firm specialized in intellectual property in Ecuador, this case offers valuable lessons for any business seeking to expand internationally:
- Registering a trademark is just the first step. True protection comes from keeping the trademark active, using it effectively, and maintaining constant monitoring in key markets.
- Genuine and provable use is crucial. In many jurisdictions, including the European Union, rights can be weakened or even lost if serious and continuous use cannot be demonstrated over specific periods.
- A brand’s reputation is also a protectable asset. Not only are distinctive signs defended, but so too are the prestige, recognition, and emotional value that a brand builds among consumers.
In a globalized world, where brands cross borders and operate across multiple platforms, the strategic management of intangible assets is not a luxury—it’s a necessity. At our law firm in Ecuador, we advise both local and international companies on the comprehensive protection of their trademarks, both nationally and abroad.
Protecting a brand is not a formality—it’s a strategy. And in that strategy, having the right legal guidance makes all the difference.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise national and international companies, entrepreneurs, and business owners to ensure compliance with legal regulations and to protect their innovations and creations.
Más Artículos
The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court
The Constitutional Court, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, declared article 19 of the Humanitarian Support Law partially unconstitutional, which allowed the unilateral termination of the emerging contract without compensation. Despite this, the contract remains valid, but the employer must compensate if the contract ends before the agreed period.
El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional
La Corte Constitucional, mediante sentencia 49-20-IN/25, declaró parcialmente inconstitucional el artículo 19 de la Ley de Apoyo Humanitario, que permitía la terminación unilateral del contrato emergente sin indemnización. A pesar de esto, el contrato sigue vigente, pero el empleador deberá indemnizar si termina el contrato antes del plazo acordado.
Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?
Abandonment in judicial proceedings is declared when the parties fail to act for six months following the last providence, except in cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, and labor rights. If declared for the first time, the claimant may file a new claim after six months; if it occurs again, the right to sue is extinguished.
El abandono en los procesos judiciales: ¿El fin de un derecho?
El abandono en los procesos judiciales se declara cuando las partes no actúan durante seis meses tras la última providencia, salvo en casos de derechos de niños, personas con discapacidad y derechos laborales. Si se declara por primera vez, el demandante puede presentar una nueva demanda tras seis meses; si ocurre nuevamente, se extingue el derecho a demandar.
WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge
The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge, adopted in 2024, establishes an international framework for the protection and recognition of ancestral knowledge. Through innovations such as the disclosure requirement, it promotes transparency in the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge in patented inventions, ensuring respect for the communities of origin.