Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The notification of disability to the employer is not a requirement for special compensation in the event of an unjustified dismissal: Binding judicial precedent in Ecuador

Resolution No. 001-2025 of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador strengthens the protection of labor rights for workers with disabilities or those responsible for individuals with disabilities in the case of unjustified dismissal. 

Labor judges and courts are no longer required to verify whether the employer was notified of the worker’s disability or if the worker is registered as a substitute in order to order the payment of the special severance pay provided for in Article 51 of the Organic Disability Law. This regulation refers to the right to compensation equivalent to 18 monthly salaries, calculated based on the highest salary the worker received, in cases of unjustified dismissal.

Key points of the resolution:

No prior notification to the employer required: It is no longer necessary for the employer to have been notified about the worker’s disability or for the worker to be registered as a substitute to request the severance pay. 

Only applicable requirements:

– There must be an unjustified dismissal. 

– The worker must have a disability or be responsible for someone with a disability. 

Protection for workers with disabilities: 

This precedent applies to individuals with disabilities, defined as those with permanent limitations in performing essential daily life activities due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments, as outlined in the Regulation of the Organic Disability Law. 

Implications of the ruling: 

  • For workers: Their right to request special severance pay in the case of unjustified dismissal is strengthened, simplifying the legal process.
  • For employers: The ruling imposes greater responsibility on managing employee information and complying with labor regulations.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.

Más Artículos

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, declared article 19 of the Humanitarian Support Law partially unconstitutional, which allowed the unilateral termination of the emerging contract without compensation. Despite this, the contract remains valid, but the employer must compensate if the contract ends before the agreed period.

El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional

El contrato especial emergente fue declarado inconstitucional por la Corte Constitucional

La Corte Constitucional, mediante sentencia 49-20-IN/25, declaró parcialmente inconstitucional el artículo 19 de la Ley de Apoyo Humanitario, que permitía la terminación unilateral del contrato emergente sin indemnización. A pesar de esto, el contrato sigue vigente, pero el empleador deberá indemnizar si termina el contrato antes del plazo acordado.

Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?

Abandonment in Judicial Proceedings: Is It the End of a Right?

Abandonment in judicial proceedings is declared when the parties fail to act for six months following the last providence, except in cases involving the rights of children, persons with disabilities, and labor rights. If declared for the first time, the claimant may file a new claim after six months; if it occurs again, the right to sue is extinguished.

El abandono en los procesos judiciales: ¿El fin de un derecho?

El abandono en los procesos judiciales: ¿El fin de un derecho?

El abandono en los procesos judiciales se declara cuando las partes no actúan durante seis meses tras la última providencia, salvo en casos de derechos de niños, personas con discapacidad y derechos laborales. Si se declara por primera vez, el demandante puede presentar una nueva demanda tras seis meses; si ocurre nuevamente, se extingue el derecho a demandar.

WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge

WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge

The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge, adopted in 2024, establishes an international framework for the protection and recognition of ancestral knowledge. Through innovations such as the disclosure requirement, it promotes transparency in the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge in patented inventions, ensuring respect for the communities of origin.

1 2 3 17

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos

Hablar con Asesor Legal
1
¿Necesitas ayuda de un Asesor Legal?
Quevedo & Ponce Abogados
Hola 👋🏻
Nos puedes ayudar con tu nombre y contarnos
¿En qué podemos ayudarte?