Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO

Floralp S.A., an Ecuadorian company dedicated to the production of dairy products, sought registration of the trademark “FLORALP FONTINA & DESIGN.” This request was objected to by the law firm Quevedo & Ponce, representing the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, a foreign entity that administers the designation of origin “FONTINA” to identify cheeses produced under specific conditions from the milk of certain breeds of cows existing in the Aosta Valley, Italy. The National Service of Intellectual Rights of Ecuador rejected the application due to the risk of confusion with products from this region.

Subsequently, Floralp S.A. filed a legal suit before the District Administrative Litigation Tribunal, seated in the Metropolitan District of Quito, requesting the declaration of illegality of this administrative decision. The company argued that the designation of origin “FONTINA” had not been registered in Ecuador and, therefore, should not be protected.

During the trial, evidence was presented demonstrating the historical recognition and registration of the designation of origin “FONTINA,” including: The Italian Presidential Decree of October 30, 1955; the International System of Designations of Origin Register of WIPO No. 503 of June 13, 1969; and the Official Bulletin of the European Union of June 21, 1996, which confirm the registration of FONTINA as a designation of origin.

On February 5, 2025, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal issued its written decision, rejecting the claim. The judgment was based on the possibility of consumer confusion if FONTINA were used as a trademark. The decision applied the mandatory criteria established by the Court of Justice of the Andean Community in multiple preliminary rulings regarding the provisions contained in Decision 486 of the Andean Community. These interpretations were also applied in national cases related to the designations of origin “PISCO” and “TEQUILA,” as well as the geographical indication “ALPINA,” among others.

This ruling is grounded in Article 135 of Decision 486 of the Andean Community, which prohibits the registration as a trademark of signs that could mislead commercial agents or the public, particularly with respect to geographical origin, nature, manufacturing process, characteristics, quality, or suitability for use of the products or services in question.

Moreover, the Tribunal determined that, although FONTINA had not been declared a designation of origin in Ecuador at the time of Floralp’s application, the fact that its use could mislead consumers, who might associate products under this brand with cheeses and milk from the Aosta Valley, constituted a risk of confusion.

Quevedo & Ponce, representing the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, reaffirms its commitment to the defense of intellectual property rights.

Más Artículos

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

The impact of fast fashion on the Ecuadorian intellectual property system, explaining which elements of fashion can be legally protected, which are not eligible for protection, and what the main challenges are for designers and brands when facing potential infringement.

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El impacto del fast fashion en el sistema de propiedad intelectual ecuatoriano, explicando qué elementos de la moda pueden protegerse legalmente, cuáles no son susceptibles de protección y cuáles son los principales desafíos para diseñadores y marcas frente a posibles plagios.

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Limited liability is one of the main advantages of incorporating a company. However, in Ecuador this protection is not absolute. Courts may apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and extend liability to shareholders or directors when the company has been misused. This has become increasingly relevant in commercial litigation and debt recovery cases.

Levantamiento del velo societario en Ecuador: cuándo la responsabilidad limitada deja de ser un escudo

Levantamiento del velo societario en Ecuador: cuándo la responsabilidad limitada deja de ser un escudo

La responsabilidad limitada es uno de los principales beneficios de constituir una compañía; sin embargo, en Ecuador no es absoluta. En determinados casos, los jueces pueden aplicar el levantamiento del velo societario y extender la responsabilidad a socios o administradores cuando se demuestra abuso de la personalidad jurídica. Este criterio cobra cada vez mayor relevancia en litigios mercantiles y de recuperación de cartera.

Nice Classification: Summary of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration

Nice Classification: Summary of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration

The Nice Classification constitutes the cornerstone of the international system used to organize goods and services for trademark registration purposes and is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The system divides goods and services into 45 classes and serves as the technical foundation for determining the scope of trademark protection. Its proper application is essential to ensure adequate protection and to avoid limitations or potential conflicts.

1 2 3 39