Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
- February 17th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
Floralp S.A., an Ecuadorian company dedicated to the production of dairy products, sought registration of the trademark “FLORALP FONTINA & DESIGN.” This request was objected to by the law firm Quevedo & Ponce, representing the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, a foreign entity that administers the designation of origin “FONTINA” to identify cheeses produced under specific conditions from the milk of certain breeds of cows existing in the Aosta Valley, Italy. The National Service of Intellectual Rights of Ecuador rejected the application due to the risk of confusion with products from this region.
Subsequently, Floralp S.A. filed a legal suit before the District Administrative Litigation Tribunal, seated in the Metropolitan District of Quito, requesting the declaration of illegality of this administrative decision. The company argued that the designation of origin “FONTINA” had not been registered in Ecuador and, therefore, should not be protected.
During the trial, evidence was presented demonstrating the historical recognition and registration of the designation of origin “FONTINA,” including: The Italian Presidential Decree of October 30, 1955; the International System of Designations of Origin Register of WIPO No. 503 of June 13, 1969; and the Official Bulletin of the European Union of June 21, 1996, which confirm the registration of FONTINA as a designation of origin.
On February 5, 2025, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal issued its written decision, rejecting the claim. The judgment was based on the possibility of consumer confusion if FONTINA were used as a trademark. The decision applied the mandatory criteria established by the Court of Justice of the Andean Community in multiple preliminary rulings regarding the provisions contained in Decision 486 of the Andean Community. These interpretations were also applied in national cases related to the designations of origin “PISCO” and “TEQUILA,” as well as the geographical indication “ALPINA,” among others.
This ruling is grounded in Article 135 of Decision 486 of the Andean Community, which prohibits the registration as a trademark of signs that could mislead commercial agents or the public, particularly with respect to geographical origin, nature, manufacturing process, characteristics, quality, or suitability for use of the products or services in question.
Moreover, the Tribunal determined that, although FONTINA had not been declared a designation of origin in Ecuador at the time of Floralp’s application, the fact that its use could mislead consumers, who might associate products under this brand with cheeses and milk from the Aosta Valley, constituted a risk of confusion.
Quevedo & Ponce, representing the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, reaffirms its commitment to the defense of intellectual property rights.
Más Artículos
The UBS Case: When Having a Compliance System Does Not Mean Controlling Risk
UBS is one of the world’s largest financial groups. Headquartered in Switzerland, it provides private banking, wealth management, investment management and investment banking services. Its United States operations include UBS Financial Services Inc., a company that provides financial and investment services to clients.
El caso UBS: cuando tener un sistema de cumplimiento no significa controlar el riesgo
UBS es uno de los mayores grupos financieros del mundo. De origen suizo, presta servicios de banca privada, administración de patrimonios, gestión de inversiones y banca de inversión. Dentro de sus operaciones en Estados Unidos se encuentra UBS Financial Services Inc., una compañía que presta servicios financieros y de inversión a clientes.
Relevant Market in Ecuador Competition Law: How Is It Defined?
The relevant market is one of the fundamental concepts in Competition Law, as it defines the scope in which companies compete and helps determine whether a particular conduct may affect market competition. Its proper definition is essential for assessing anticompetitive practices, abuse of market power, and merger control
Mercado relevante en el Derecho de Competencia en Ecuador: ¿Cómo se define?
El mercado relevante constituye uno de los conceptos fundamentales del Derecho de Competencia, pues permite determinar el ámbito en el que las empresas compiten y evaluar si una conducta puede afectar el funcionamiento del mercado. Su correcta definición resulta esencial para analizar prácticas anticompetitivas, abuso de poder de mercado y concentraciones económicas.
Implications of Personal Data Processing in Contractual Matters
In the Ecuadorian business environment, the inclusion of specific data protection clauses in contracts is not optional, but rather a legal obligation under the LOPDP, which prohibits the use of generic authorizations, to ensure that the processing of information is lawful and to avoid severe sanctions by the Superintendence of Personal Data Protection.
