Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration

In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.

Is it possible for a common term to be perceived as offensive?
The answer is yes. A clear example is the case of the “Bimbo” brand. In May 2024, the Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland rejected the registration of the “BIMBO QSR” trademark, considering that “Bimbo” is offensive in German. Although the Bimbo Group appealed, the Federal Court upheld the decision in November 2024, emphasizing how cultural perception influences trademark registration.

How is it decided whether a trademark is immoral or not?
The decision depends not only on local legislation but also on the social and cultural context of each region. In Switzerland, sensitivity towards potentially offensive terms has been crucial in rejecting trademarks, with the goal of protecting human dignity and preventing the perpetuation of prejudices.

This case highlights the importance of carefully analyzing the cultural impact of trademarks before registration, a fundamental lesson for companies seeking to expand internationally.

With extensive experience in the field, Quevedo & Ponce provides specialized legal advice, ensuring that registered trademarks comply not only with legal standards but also with the social values prevailing in our society.

Más Artículos

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

1 2 3 35

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos