Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Lease Agreements in Ecuador: Legal Requirements for Formalization and Registration
- June 26th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
In Ecuador, the lease agreement is a legal contract through which one person (the landlord) grants another (the tenant) the use of a real estate property in exchange for a monthly rent. According to Article 27 of the Tenancy Law, this contract may be verbal or written. However, if the monthly rent exceeds the unified basic salary, the law requires the contract to be executed in writing (Art. 29).
The lease agreement is considered valid as soon as there is an agreement on the use of the property and the rent payment, even if it is not formalized. However, formalization provides legal protection to both parties, prevents abuse, and enables access to judicial proceedings in the event of a conflict.
Under current regulations, if the rent does not exceed the basic salary, it must be registered in the municipal cadastre. If it does exceed it, the contract must be registered before a notary within thirty days of its execution.
Key obligations under the Tenancy Law:
- Comply with the current legal rent (Art. 17).
- Register the contract with the corresponding authority (Art. 14).
- Offer the tenant a contract with a minimum term of two years (Art. 28).
What happens if the contract is not registered?
You will not be able to request eviction, the contract will lose legal standing, the judge will require a rent certificate, and you may face fines of up to six monthly rents.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us to receive guidance on this important precedent and its impact in the labor field.
Más Artículos
WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge
The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge, adopted in 2024, establishes an international framework for the protection and recognition of ancestral knowledge. Through innovations such as the disclosure requirement, it promotes transparency in the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge in patented inventions, ensuring respect for the communities of origin.
Dissolution, Liquidation, and Cancellation of Commercial Companies in Ecuador
The dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation of commercial companies in Ecuador is a key process when a company ceases to operate, no longer generates income, or becomes unprofitable. Closure of the company in a timely manner prevents the accumulation of fiscal and administrative obligations, thereby reducing the risk of sanctions and unnecessary expenses. There are various legal options to perform this procedure, each suited to different circumstances.
Avoid Fines which rank from 2 to 20 Basic Salaries! – Gender Equality Plan for Companies in Ecuador
The Equality Plan must be registered before July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor, or fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries will be imposed on companies and public institutions that fail to comply with the law. This Plan ensures equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace, promoting inclusion and aiming to eliminate discrimination.
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.
