Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
New Labor Rights under the Organic Law on Persons with Disabilities
- July 11th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The National Intellectual Property Service (SENADI), exercising its regulatory authority, has issued Resolution No. 003-2024-DG-NT-SENADI. This technical standard aims to regulate preparatory procedures for verification and blocking of URLs that may violate intellectual property rights in the digital environment. Its application focuses on protecting intellectual property rights against the difficulty of identifying and locating the alleged infringer and to curb infringements that easily migrate to other digital infrastructures.
To request this preparatory procedure, the interested party must submit an application to SENADI’s Technical Enforcement Directorate. Requirements include identification of the applicant and notification methods, determination and accreditation of the allegedly violated right, factual and legal grounds, and identification of the subject against whom the procedure is directed, if known. It is essential to specify the object and purpose of the procedure, which is the concrete request for verification and blocking of URLs with infringing content. The URLs must be listed along with IP addresses and access ports, and a sworn statement before a Notary Public assuming responsibility for possible harm to third parties must be submitted. Additionally, notarized evidence of the URL displaying the infringing content, the applicant’s signature, and proof of payment of the corresponding fee are required.
Once the application is deemed clear and complete, the Technical Enforcement Directorate will verify whether the URL content may allegedly infringe intellectual property rights. If confirmed, authorized internet service providers and carriers in Ecuador will be ordered to block the URLs and redirect them to an informative website about the alleged violation. The standard also contemplates dynamic blocking and the possibility to request the maintenance of the block if a principal action, such as an administrative protection claim, is initiated. It is important to note that this procedure does not apply to blocking domain names, social media content, or content through digital streaming applications.
At Quevedo and Ponce, we offer specialized advice on the application of preparatory procedures to protect intellectual property rights in the digital environment. Our team is ready to guide you through the verification and URL blocking request processes, ensuring the defense of your rights in the digital realm.
Más Artículos
Avoid Fines which rank from 2 to 20 Basic Salaries! – Gender Equality Plan for Companies in Ecuador
The Equality Plan must be registered before July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor, or fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries will be imposed on companies and public institutions that fail to comply with the law. This Plan ensures equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace, promoting inclusion and aiming to eliminate discrimination.
¡Evita multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos! – Plan de igualdad laboral para compañías
El Plan de Igualdad, debe registrarse antes del 31 de julio de 2025 ante el Ministerio del Trabajo, o se impondrán multas de 2 a 20 salarios básicos a las compañías e instituciones públicas que no cumplan con la ley. Este Plan garantiza el mismo trato y oportunidades entre mujeres y hombres en el ámbito laboral, promoviendo la inclusión y buscando eliminar la discriminación.
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Marca “BIMBO” Rechazada en Suiza: La Importancia de las Percepciones Culturales en el Registro de Marcas
El impacto social de los términos en las marcas va más allá de lo legal. Un ejemplo reciente es el rechazo de la marca “BIMBO QSR” en Suiza, donde “Bimbo” se considera ofensivo en alemán. Este caso subraya la necesidad de evaluar las sensibilidades culturales al registrar una marca, especialmente para empresas con proyección internacional.
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.
