Quevedo & Ponce

Quevedo & Ponce - Legal News

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

On October 8, 2025, the National Court of Justice issued Resolution No. 16-2025, by which it declared a binding jurisprudential precedent regarding the application of Article 216 of the Labor Code, related to employer retirement compensation. This resolution consolidates the uniform criterion sustained by the Specialized Labor Chamber in several rulings and has general and binding effects as of its publication in the Official Gazette on November 7, 2025.

This precedent arises from the Court’s repeated analysis of cases discussing the employer’s right to deduct certain amounts from the employer retirement fund. According to the Court’s interpretation, the employer may only deduct amounts corresponding to reserve funds, whether deposited in the Ecuadorian Social Security Institute (IESS) or directly paid to the employee. On the other hand, employer contributions to the IESS are not part of the employee’s individual retirement fund, as they constitute obligations of a different legal nature.

This distinction is based in Rule 1 of Article 216 of the Labor Code, which establishes that the individual fund used to calculate employer retirement compensation consists of two components: the reserve fund and an amount equivalent to five percent of the average annual remuneration received during the last five years, multiplied by the years of service. Based on this framework, the Court emphasizes that the deduction of reserve funds is the only one permitted, in observance of the principle of favorability provided in Article 326(3) of the Constitution, which establishes that the most favorable interpretation to the worker must always prevail.

The resolution strengthens the system of binding precedents in Ecuador, ensuring consistency in the application of labor law and reinforcing legal security, pursuant to Article 82 of the Constitution. From now, all courts and judges are required to observe this criterion when resolving disputes concerning employer retirement compensation, thereby guaranteeing equitable and predictable treatment in similar cases.

At Quevedo & Ponce, where Dr. Marcos Ponce—Specialist and Professor of Labor Law—has recently joined our team, to provide specialized advisory services to employers and employees, ensuring compliance with current regulations and proper management of employer obligations.

Más Artículos

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

The National Court of Justice has issued a new binding jurisprudential precedent that redefines the calculation of employer retirement compensation in Ecuador. Resolution No. 16-2025 specifies which amounts may be deducted from the employee’s individual retirement fund, reinforcing the principle of favorability and legal security in labor matters.

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

Mediation: An effective and legal way to resolve conflicts in Ecuador

Mediation: An effective and legal way to resolve conflicts in Ecuador

Mediation is a conflict resolution process whereby the parties, assisted by a neutral third party called a mediator, seek to reach a voluntary agreement on a negotiable matter, in an extrajudicial and definitive manner. This mechanism promotes fast, confidential, and fair solutions that have the same legal validity as a final judgment, fostering dialogue and a culture of peace in Ecuador.

1 2 3 13

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos