Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
No severance compensation for public servants in cases of voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement: New binding jurisprudential precedent for Ecuador
- February 6th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The Resolution No. 03-2025 of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador, issued on January 29, 2025, establishes the impropriety of severance compensation in cases of voluntary retirement for the public sector.
According to the ruling, “a worker who has decided to terminate their employment relationship through voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement cannot receive the severance compensation provided for in the second paragraph of Article 184 of the Labor Code,” arguing that they would be benefiting twice from the termination of the employment relationship.
What is severance?
This legal concept arises when the worker notifies the employer in writing of their intention to terminate the employment relationship. The law also considers severance when both the worker and the employer mutually agree to the termination in writing.
How is severance compensation calculated?
When a worker terminates their employment through severance, the employer must pay them a bonus equal to 25% of their last monthly salary for each year worked. The employer has 15 days to pay this bonus and other rights owed to the worker.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise public servants to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect their labor rights. Contact us for guidance on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.
Más Artículos
IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions
Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20
IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos
La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.
Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin
Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.
Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen
Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.
Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity
The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.
