Skip to main content

Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The notification of disability to the employer is not a requirement for special compensation in the event of an unjustified dismissal: Binding judicial precedent in Ecuador

Resolution No. 001-2025 of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador strengthens the protection of labor rights for workers with disabilities or those responsible for individuals with disabilities in the case of unjustified dismissal. 

Labor judges and courts are no longer required to verify whether the employer was notified of the worker’s disability or if the worker is registered as a substitute in order to order the payment of the special severance pay provided for in Article 51 of the Organic Disability Law. This regulation refers to the right to compensation equivalent to 18 monthly salaries, calculated based on the highest salary the worker received, in cases of unjustified dismissal.

Key points of the resolution:

No prior notification to the employer required: It is no longer necessary for the employer to have been notified about the worker’s disability or for the worker to be registered as a substitute to request the severance pay. 

Only applicable requirements:

– There must be an unjustified dismissal. 

– The worker must have a disability or be responsible for someone with a disability. 

Protection for workers with disabilities: 

This precedent applies to individuals with disabilities, defined as those with permanent limitations in performing essential daily life activities due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments, as outlined in the Regulation of the Organic Disability Law. 

Implications of the ruling: 

  • For workers: Their right to request special severance pay in the case of unjustified dismissal is strengthened, simplifying the legal process.
  • For employers: The ruling imposes greater responsibility on managing employee information and complying with labor regulations.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.

Más Artículos

Use of Digital Avatars: An Appropriate Measure Against Organized Crime?

Use of Digital Avatars: An Appropriate Measure Against Organized Crime?

Through Resolution No. 164-2026, the Plenary of Ecuador’s Council of the Judiciary approved the Technical-Operational Protocol for the Use of Digital Avatars as a Security Measure in Remote Hearings, introducing a new technological tool intended to mitigate certain risks faced by judges and other judicial officers.

Uso de avatares digitales: ¿una medida adecuada frente al crimen organizado?

Uso de avatares digitales: ¿una medida adecuada frente al crimen organizado?

Mediante la Resolución No. 164-2026, el Pleno del Consejo de la Judicatura aprobó el Protocolo Técnico-Operativo para el Uso de Avatares Digitales como Medida de Seguridad en Audiencias Telemáticas, incorporando una nueva herramienta tecnológica destinada a reducir determinados riesgos a los que se encuentran expuestos jueces y otros funcionarios judiciales.

Plant Varieties in Ecuador: Protecting Innovation in the Agricultural Sector

Plant Varieties in Ecuador: Protecting Innovation in the Agricultural Sector

The development of new plant varieties represents an important source of innovation in the agricultural sector.

Obtenciones Vegetales en Ecuador: protección de la innovación en el sector agrícola

Obtenciones Vegetales en Ecuador: protección de la innovación en el sector agrícola

El desarrollo de nuevas variedades vegetales representa una importante fuente de innovación para el sector agrícola.

Economic Concentrations in Ecuador

Economic Concentrations in Ecuador

Mergers, acquisitions, and transactions involving a change of control may be subject to Ecuador’s economic concentration control regime. The applicable rules establish specific thresholds to determine when a transaction must be notified in advance to the Superintendence of Economic Competition and allow the authority to authorize, condition, or prohibit a transaction depending on its effects on competition.

1 2 3 44