Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
The notification of disability to the employer is not a requirement for special compensation in the event of an unjustified dismissal: Binding judicial precedent in Ecuador
- January 21, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
Resolution No. 001-2025 of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador strengthens the protection of labor rights for workers with disabilities or those responsible for individuals with disabilities in the case of unjustified dismissal.
Labor judges and courts are no longer required to verify whether the employer was notified of the worker’s disability or if the worker is registered as a substitute in order to order the payment of the special severance pay provided for in Article 51 of the Organic Disability Law. This regulation refers to the right to compensation equivalent to 18 monthly salaries, calculated based on the highest salary the worker received, in cases of unjustified dismissal.
Key points of the resolution:
No prior notification to the employer required: It is no longer necessary for the employer to have been notified about the worker’s disability or for the worker to be registered as a substitute to request the severance pay.
Only applicable requirements:
– There must be an unjustified dismissal.
– The worker must have a disability or be responsible for someone with a disability.
Protection for workers with disabilities:
This precedent applies to individuals with disabilities, defined as those with permanent limitations in performing essential daily life activities due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments, as outlined in the Regulation of the Organic Disability Law.
Implications of the ruling:
- For workers: Their right to request special severance pay in the case of unjustified dismissal is strengthened, simplifying the legal process.
- For employers: The ruling imposes greater responsibility on managing employee information and complying with labor regulations.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.
Más Artículos
The Constitutional Court provisionally suspended articles from three recently approved laws
On August 4, the Constitutional Court announced the decisions adopted by the Admissions Chamber. Among them was the provisional suspension of a transitory provision of the Organic Law on Public Integrity, several articles and the regulations of the Organic Law on Intelligence, and certain articles of the Organic Law on National Solidarity.
La Corte Constitucional suspendió provisionalmente artículos de tres leyes aprobadas recientemente
El 4 de agosto, la Corte Constitucional informó sobre las decisiones adoptadas en la Sala de Admisiones. Entre ellas, se dispuso la suspensión provisional de una disposición transitoria de la Ley Orgánica de Integridad Pública, de varios artículos y el reglamento de la Ley Orgánica de Inteligencia, y de algunos artículos de la Ley Orgánica de Solidaridad Nacional.
New Rules for the Annulment of Electronic Tax Documents in Ecuador: Tax Implications for Taxpayers
Discover the key changes introduced by Resolution NAC-DGERCGC25-00000014 issued by the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service (SRI), effective as of August 1, 2025, which regulate the annulment of electronic tax documents in Ecuador. This analysis addresses the tax implications and legal challenges for companies operating under electronic invoicing schemes.
Nuevas reglas para la anulación de comprobantes electrónicos en Ecuador: implicaciones tributarias para los contribuyentes
Descubra los principales cambios introducidos por la Resolución NAC-DGERCGC25-00000014 emitida por el Servicio de Impuestos Internos del Ecuador (SRI), vigente a partir del 1 de agosto de 2025, que regulan la anulación de documentos tributarios electrónicos en el Ecuador. Este análisis aborda las implicaciones fiscales y los desafíos legales para las empresas que operan bajo esquemas de facturación electrónica.
Intellectual Property, International Harmonization, and the Role of Customs: The Philco Case as a Warning for Export-Oriented Companies
The use of trademarks in cross-border manufacturing operations poses significant legal risks, as evidenced by the Philco case in Brazil. This article analyzes how the unauthorized use of a trademark during manufacturing — even when the products are intended for export — may activate judicial and customs actions. Focusing the impact of the territoriality principle and the need for an international legal strategy.
