Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Protection Action in Defense of Galapagos Turtles and Iguanas: Guaranteeing the Rights of Nature and Biodiversity

In 2022, it was discovered that endemic species from the Galapagos archipelago were being illegally traded in countries such as Uganda, Mali, and Switzerland, as well as on online platforms.

Faced with this alarming situation, our partner Milton Castillo filed a protection action that resulted in a favorable ruling. This ruling orders the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition of Ecuador (MAATE) to manage the transfer of the following species from Appendix II to Appendix I in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES):

  • Amblyrhynchus cristatus
  • Conolophus marthae
  • Conolophus subcristatus
  • Conolophus pallidus (Iguanas)
  • Chelonoidis nigra (Galapagos Tortoise)

Species listed in Appendix I of CITES cannot be commercially traded and can only be exported for research purposes, thus providing a higher level of protection compared to species in Appendix II, which can still be traded under strict international parameters.

Judge Viviana Pila, in her ruling, emphasized the violation of the precautionary principle established in the Constitution of Ecuador, highlighting the need to prevent potential harm and protect the rights of nature.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we are deeply committed to the fight against the illegal trafficking of species in the Galapagos Islands. This issue not only threatens the rich biodiversity of the archipelago but also endangers the survival of unique species worldwide. We work tirelessly to ensure that the Galapagos archipelago continues to be a symbol of Ecuador’s extraordinary biodiversity.

Más Artículos

Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters

Processing of Proposed Laws Classified as Urgent Economic Matters

Proposing urgent economic bills is one of the powers of the Executive Function; however, these must be submitted to the National Assembly for approval, modification, or rejection. In accordance with the Constitution and the Organic Law of the Legislative Function, a failure to issue a ruling results in the immediate enactment of the project by operation of law.

Tratamiento de proyectos de ley calificados como urgentes en materia económica

Tratamiento de proyectos de ley calificados como urgentes en materia económica

Proponer proyectos de ley urgentes en materia económica es una de las facultades de la Función Ejecutiva, sin embargo, esto se debe remitir a la Asamblea Nacional para que se apruebe, modifique o niegue el proyecto. Conforme a la Constitución y la Ley Orgánica de la Función Legislativa, la falta de pronunciamiento da lugar a la vigencia inmediata del proyecto por ministerio de la ley.

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

Fast Fashion in Ecuador: Legal Protection, Boundaries, and Emerging Challenges in the Creative Industry

The impact of fast fashion on the Ecuadorian intellectual property system, explaining which elements of fashion can be legally protected, which are not eligible for protection, and what the main challenges are for designers and brands when facing potential infringement.

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El Fast Fashion en Ecuador: Protección legal, límites y desafíos dentro de la industria creativa

El impacto del fast fashion en el sistema de propiedad intelectual ecuatoriano, explicando qué elementos de la moda pueden protegerse legalmente, cuáles no son susceptibles de protección y cuáles son los principales desafíos para diseñadores y marcas frente a posibles plagios.

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Piercing the Corporate Veil in Ecuador: When limited liability no longer protects shareholders

Limited liability is one of the main advantages of incorporating a company. However, in Ecuador this protection is not absolute. Courts may apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and extend liability to shareholders or directors when the company has been misused. This has become increasingly relevant in commercial litigation and debt recovery cases.

1 2 3 39