Skip to main content

Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court analyzed the constitutionality of article 19 of the Organic Law of Humanitarian Support, related to the emerging special contract; and, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, determined that it violates the principle of intangibility of labor rights by allowing the employer to unilaterally terminate the contract without compensation. For this reason, it declared said provision partially unconstitutional, nullifying the possibility of finalyzing the contract before the deadline without payment of compensation.

Despite this ruling, the emergent contract remains in effect with the following characteristics:

  1. It can be signed for a maximum of one year, renewable once.
  2. It is not exclusively linked to the pandemic but can be applied to any temporary situation that justifies the need to ensure business sustainability.
  3. If the employer terminates the contract unilaterally before its term, compensation for unfair dismissal will be required.
  4. The contract becomes indefinite if the employment relationship continues after the term ends.

The Court also reminded the National Assembly to evaluate the Humanitarian Support Law and modify it if necessary, to ensure it meets its objectives. Additionally, it emphasized that the Ministry of Labor must oversee the proper use of the emergent contract to prevent violation.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we are experts in labor and constitutional law, providing effective consultancy on matters such as emergent contracts. Contact us to protect your rights and ensure successful legal solutions.

Más Artículos

How to ensure a clear, valid, and proper property transfer

How to ensure a clear, valid, and proper property transfer

The purchase and sale of real estate in Ecuador is a legal act that requires document verification, compliance of notarial requirements, and registration before the Property Registry. This process demands a review of the property’s legal status and the involvement of a specialized attorney to ensure a valid, secure, and properly executed transfer of ownership.

Cómo asegurar una compraventa clara, válida y correcta

Cómo asegurar una compraventa clara, válida y correcta

La compraventa de inmuebles en Ecuador es un acto jurídico que exige verificación documental, cumplimiento de requisitos notariales e inscripción en el Registro de la Propiedad. Este proceso requiere una revisión del estado legal del inmueble y la intervención de un abogado especializado para garantizar una transferencia de dominio válida, segura y correcta.

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

The National Court of Justice establishes a new binding jurisprudential precedent on employer retirement compensation

The National Court of Justice has issued a new binding jurisprudential precedent that redefines the calculation of employer retirement compensation in Ecuador. Resolution No. 16-2025 specifies which amounts may be deducted from the employee’s individual retirement fund, reinforcing the principle of favorability and legal security in labor matters.

La Corte Nacional de Justicia establece un nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio sobre jubilación patronal

La Corte Nacional de Justicia establece un nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio sobre jubilación patronal

La Corte Nacional de Justicia ha emitido un nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio que redefine el cálculo de la jubilación patronal en el Ecuador. La Resolución No. 16-2025 precisa qué valores pueden descontarse del haber individual del trabajador, reforzando el principio de favorabilidad y la seguridad jurídica en materia laboral

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

1 7 8 9 10 11 44