Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Superintendence of Personal Data Protection Issues Opinion on the Use of Biometric Data for Attendance Control

The Superintendence of Personal Data Protection has issued an opinion on Inquiry 002-2025, referenced in Official Letter No. SPDP-IRD-2025-0031-O, regarding the processing of biometric data for labor attendance control.

The authority establishes that explicit consent is required for the processing of biometric data in labor attendance control, and for consent to be considered valid, it must be free, specific, informed, and unequivocal.

Consent must be free, without coercion or undue pressure, and free from vices such as force or real fear, like the fear of losing one’s job. It must be specific, limited to a concrete purpose, and without ambiguity regarding its scope. Additionally, it must be informed, ensuring that the data subject clearly understands the purposes and conditions of the data processing. Finally, it must be unequivocal, expressed clearly and without doubt, ensuring that the data subject’s will is consciously expressed.

Regarding the involved parties:

  • Employers: They must ensure the consent of their workers before collecting biometric data and provide alternatives for those who do not wish to provide their data.
  • Workers: They may refuse the processing of their biometric data without it affecting their employment conditions and may request the deletion of their biometric data when applicable.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect the rights to personal data security. Contact us for guidance on this important precedent and its impact in the labor field.

Más Artículos

“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration

“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration

In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.

Marca “BIMBO” Rechazada en Suiza: La Importancia de las Percepciones Culturales en el Registro de Marcas

Marca “BIMBO” Rechazada en Suiza: La Importancia de las Percepciones Culturales en el Registro de Marcas

El impacto social de los términos en las marcas va más allá de lo legal. Un ejemplo reciente es el rechazo de la marca “BIMBO QSR” en Suiza, donde “Bimbo” se considera ofensivo en alemán. Este caso subraya la necesidad de evaluar las sensibilidades culturales al registrar una marca, especialmente para empresas con proyección internacional.

Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO

Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO

Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Quevedo & Ponce actuó exitosamente en representación del Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, ante una demanda presentada por una compañía ecuatoriana, en que se alegó principalmente que FONTINA no estaba registrada en Ecuador. Sin embargo, el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo con Sede en el Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, ratificó el acto administrativo impugnado, citando el riesgo de confusión para el consumidor y aplicando la Decisión 486 de la Comunidad Andina, destacando la importancia de proteger las denominaciones de origen, incluso sin un registro formal en Ecuador.

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

Litigation can pose risks to your company’s resources and reputation. To prevent such risks, it is essential to adopt preventive measures, including drafting clear and comprehensive contracts, ensuring compliance with labor laws, safeguarding intellectual property, maintaining transparent accounting practices, engaging the services of a specialized attorney, and promoting internal conflict resolution. With appropriate legal counsel, you can protect your business and ensure its uninterrupted growth, free from legal disruptions.

1 8 9 10 11 12 24

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos