Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Superintendence of Personal Data Protection Issues Opinion on the Use of Biometric Data for Attendance Control
- March 20th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
The Superintendence of Personal Data Protection has issued an opinion on Inquiry 002-2025, referenced in Official Letter No. SPDP-IRD-2025-0031-O, regarding the processing of biometric data for labor attendance control.
The authority establishes that explicit consent is required for the processing of biometric data in labor attendance control, and for consent to be considered valid, it must be free, specific, informed, and unequivocal.
Consent must be free, without coercion or undue pressure, and free from vices such as force or real fear, like the fear of losing one’s job. It must be specific, limited to a concrete purpose, and without ambiguity regarding its scope. Additionally, it must be informed, ensuring that the data subject clearly understands the purposes and conditions of the data processing. Finally, it must be unequivocal, expressed clearly and without doubt, ensuring that the data subject’s will is consciously expressed.
Regarding the involved parties:
- Employers: They must ensure the consent of their workers before collecting biometric data and provide alternatives for those who do not wish to provide their data.
- Workers: They may refuse the processing of their biometric data without it affecting their employment conditions and may request the deletion of their biometric data when applicable.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect the rights to personal data security. Contact us for guidance on this important precedent and its impact in the labor field.
Más Artículos
Has your company remedied the grounds for dissolution? you may request its exclusion from the massive resolution and to continue operating legally.
The Companies Act allows to request the exclusion of a company from a massive dissolution resolution if the grounds for dissolution have been remedied and the resolution has not been registered before the Mercantile Registry. This alternative avoids to initiate a reactivation process and enables the company to maintain its legal standing. This article explains the circumstances under which this option may be exercised and the requirements that must be complied.
¿Su compañía superó la causal de disolución? Puede solicitar su exclusión de la resolución masiva y seguir operando legalmente.
La Ley de Compañías permite solicitar la exclusión de una empresa de una resolución de disolución masiva si se ha superado la causal y esta no ha sido inscrita en el Registro Mercantil. Esta alternativa evita el trámite de reactivación y permite conservar la vigencia legal de la empresa. En este artículo, explicamos cuándo es posible optar por esta vía y los requisitos que deben cumplirse.
Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (ETG) in Ecuador: Protecting Tradition with Legal Recognition
Within the framework of Ecuador’s intellectual property system, Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSG) represents a strategic legal mechanism for the protection of agri-food products with proven cultural value and traditional heritage. This tool provides official recognition of the authenticity of traditional production methods, without requiring a specific territorial link.
Especialidades Tradicionales Garantizadas (ETG) en Ecuador: Protegiendo la tradición con valor legal
En el marco del sistema de propiedad intelectual ecuatoriano, las Especialidades Tradicionales Garantizadas (ETG) constituyen una figura legal estratégica para la protección de productos agroalimentarios con valor cultural y tradición comprobada. A través de esta herramienta, se reconoce oficialmente la autenticidad de métodos de elaboración tradicionales, sin requerir una vinculación territorial específica.
Arbitration in Ecuador: An Effective Alternative for Dispute Resolution
Arbitration in Ecuador is an effective alternative for resolving disputes, highlighting benefits such as celerity, confidentiality, and the ability to choose expert arbitrators, making the process more efficient and specialized than ordinary courts.
