Skip to main content

Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The Superintendence of Companies, through Resolution No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 dated March 7, 2025, has introduced an important reform to the "Regulation on General Meetings or General Assembly of Partners and Shareholders"

The Superintendence of Companies, through Resolution No. SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2025-0001 dated March 7, 2025, has introduced an important reform to the “Regulation on General Meetings or General Assembly of Partners and Shareholders.”

The modification consists of recognizing a proprietary right for partners and shareholders to freely and individually decide how they wish to participate in the general assembly sessions, whether physically or virtually, through videoconferencing or other telecommunication means.

This reform aims to guarantee the exercise of the right to participate for partners and shareholders. Under this provision, the administrator of the meeting will not be able to impose a single mandatory attendance mode. The convocation must reflect that partners and shareholders have the freedom to choose between in-person or virtual attendance.

Furthermore, it is established that, except in the case of universal meetings, the sessions must be held at the company’s principal address, as stipulated by the Companies Law, provided that all partners or shareholders choose to attend in person. In the case of mixed attendance, the session must also be held at the principal address, at the location specified in the convocation, respecting the participation mode chosen by each shareholder or partner.

Finally, it is stated that all other provisions of the regulation will apply, ensuring regulatory consistency and respect for the principles of legality and participation within the corporate sphere.

The reform applies to limited liability companies, joint-stock companies, partnerships by shares, mixed-economy companies, and simplified joint-stock companies.

For simplified joint-stock companies (S.A.S.), a specific provision is included, allowing the general shareholders’ meetings to be held both at the company’s principal address and outside of it, as established by the Companies Law, providing greater flexibility to this type of company.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and shareholders to ensure compliance with legal provisions in corporate matters and strengthen participation in corporate governance bodies.

Más Artículos

The right to remain unpublished and the posthumous publication of Gabriel García Márquez’s work «See You in August»

The right to remain unpublished and the posthumous publication of Gabriel García Márquez’s work «See You in August»

We all celebrate being able to read one more work by García Márquez, but what about respect for his copyright? The posthumous publication of «See You in August» has reignited the debate over the right to remain unpublished, an inalienable moral right that empowers creators to decide whether their work is released or remains unpublished. Although the Colombian Nobel laureate expressed his intention not to publish it during his lifetime, his heirs authorized its publication, raising an ethical and legal dilemma regarding the limits of rights heirs as custodians of the author’s original intent.

El derecho al inédito y la publicación póstuma de la obra “En agosto nos vemos» de Gabriel García Márquez

El derecho al inédito y la publicación póstuma de la obra “En agosto nos vemos» de Gabriel García Márquez

Todos celebramos poder leer una obra más de García Márquez, pero ¿dónde queda el respeto a sus derechos de autor? La publicación póstuma de «En agosto nos vemos» ha reavivado el debate sobre el derecho al inédito, un derecho moral irrenunciable que faculta al creador a decidir si su obra se divulga o permanece en reserva. Pese a que el Nobel colombiano manifestó en vida su intención de no publicarla, sus herederos autorizaron su publicación, planteando un dilema ético y jurídico sobre los límites de los derechohabientes como custodios de la voluntad originaria del autor..

The UBS Case: When Having a Compliance System Does Not Mean Controlling Risk

The UBS Case: When Having a Compliance System Does Not Mean Controlling Risk

UBS is one of the world’s largest financial groups. Headquartered in Switzerland, it provides private banking, wealth management, investment management and investment banking services. Its United States operations include UBS Financial Services Inc., a company that provides financial and investment services to clients.

El caso UBS: cuando tener un sistema de cumplimiento no significa controlar el riesgo

El caso UBS: cuando tener un sistema de cumplimiento no significa controlar el riesgo

UBS es uno de los mayores grupos financieros del mundo. De origen suizo, presta servicios de banca privada, administración de patrimonios, gestión de inversiones y banca de inversión. Dentro de sus operaciones en Estados Unidos se encuentra UBS Financial Services Inc., una compañía que presta servicios financieros y de inversión a clientes.

Relevant Market in Ecuador Competition Law: How Is It Defined?

Relevant Market in Ecuador Competition Law: How Is It Defined?

The relevant market is one of the fundamental concepts in Competition Law, as it defines the scope in which companies compete and helps determine whether a particular conduct may affect market competition. Its proper definition is essential for assessing anticompetitive practices, abuse of market power, and merger control

1 2 3 43