Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
The Constitutional Court guarantees the right to maternity leave even in the event of the newborn's death
- May 8th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
On September 4, 2018, a woman gave birth via cesarean section and was granted maternity leave until November 26. Following the death of her child on September 16, officials from the Judiciary Council requested that she justify her absence with a leave for domestic calamity, even though her original medical certificate remained valid. Despite her insistence that she had the right to maintain her maternity leave under the LOSEP Regulations, she was informed that such right was extinguished by the death of the baby, according to an interpretation of the Organic Law of the Judicial Function. As a result, the National Directorate of Human Talent decided to suspend her leave, prompting the claimant to file a lawsuit for violation of her rights to maternity protection, health, care, and equality, as her need for physical and emotional recovery after childbirth and the loss of her child had not been recognized.
In response, the Court raised the following question:
Did the decision of the Provincial Directorate of Ibarra to refer for consultation the validity of the maternity leave violate the claimant’s right to protection as a woman in a period of maternity?
The Constitution of Ecuador recognizes pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding women as a priority group, guaranteeing their health and recovery. Both national and international regulations (CEDAW and the Constitution) establish that the right to health includes not only the absence of illness but also comprehensive well-being, which is especially important for women undergoing postpartum recovery or grieving a neonatal loss. CEDAW also requires that maternity leave be respected without affecting employment or benefits. The Court acknowledged that, although there may be normative ambiguity between the COFJ and the LOSEP Regulation, such consultation does not justify suspending the exercise of a fundamental right.
As a result, the Court determined that the claimant’s rights to priority protection, health, and dignified postpartum recovery were violated, and urged public institutions to refrain from repeating such practices.
At Quevedo & Ponce, we assist companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect labor rights. Contact us for advice on this important precedent and its impact on the labor field.
Más Artículos
IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions
Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20
IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos
La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.
Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin
Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.
Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen
Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.
Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity
The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.
