Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

The special emergent contract was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court analyzed the constitutionality of article 19 of the Organic Law of Humanitarian Support, related to the emerging special contract; and, by ruling 49-20-IN/25, determined that it violates the principle of intangibility of labor rights by allowing the employer to unilaterally terminate the contract without compensation. For this reason, it declared said provision partially unconstitutional, nullifying the possibility of finalyzing the contract before the deadline without payment of compensation.

Despite this ruling, the emergent contract remains in effect with the following characteristics:

  1. It can be signed for a maximum of one year, renewable once.
  2. It is not exclusively linked to the pandemic but can be applied to any temporary situation that justifies the need to ensure business sustainability.
  3. If the employer terminates the contract unilaterally before its term, compensation for unfair dismissal will be required.
  4. The contract becomes indefinite if the employment relationship continues after the term ends.

The Court also reminded the National Assembly to evaluate the Humanitarian Support Law and modify it if necessary, to ensure it meets its objectives. Additionally, it emphasized that the Ministry of Labor must oversee the proper use of the emergent contract to prevent violation.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we are experts in labor and constitutional law, providing effective consultancy on matters such as emergent contracts. Contact us to protect your rights and ensure successful legal solutions.

Más Artículos

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Quevedo & Ponce actuó exitosamente en representación del Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, ante una demanda presentada por una compañía ecuatoriana, en que se alegó principalmente que FONTINA no estaba registrada en Ecuador. Sin embargo, el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo con Sede en el Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, ratificó el acto administrativo impugnado, citando el riesgo de confusión para el consumidor y aplicando la Decisión 486 de la Comunidad Andina, destacando la importancia de proteger las denominaciones de origen, incluso sin un registro formal en Ecuador.

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

Litigation can pose risks to your company’s resources and reputation. To prevent such risks, it is essential to adopt preventive measures, including drafting clear and comprehensive contracts, ensuring compliance with labor laws, safeguarding intellectual property, maintaining transparent accounting practices, engaging the services of a specialized attorney, and promoting internal conflict resolution. With appropriate legal counsel, you can protect your business and ensure its uninterrupted growth, free from legal disruptions.

Cómo Proteger Tu Empresa de Litigios: Consejos Legales Básicos

Cómo Proteger Tu Empresa de Litigios: Consejos Legales Básicos

Los litigios pueden poner en riesgo los recursos y la reputación de tu empresa. Para evitarlos, es fundamental tomar medidas preventivas como redactar contratos claros, cumplir con la legislación laboral, proteger la propiedad intelectual, mantener una contabilidad transparente, contar con un abogado especializado y fomentar la resolución interna de conflictos. Con la asesoría legal adecuada, puedes proteger tu negocio y asegurar su crecimiento sin interrupciones legales.

No hay bonificación por desahucio para los servidores públicos, en casos de retiro voluntario para acogerse a la jubilación: Nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio para Ecuador

No hay bonificación por desahucio para los servidores públicos, en casos de retiro voluntario para acogerse a la jubilación: Nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio para Ecuador

Esta resolución se aplica específicamente a los servidores públicos que se acogen al retiro (cesación de funciones) para beneficiarse de la jubilación, según lo dispuesto en el artículo 47 de la Ley Orgánica de Servicio Público (LOSEP).

No severance compensation for public servants in cases of voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement: New binding jurisprudential precedent for Ecuador

No severance compensation for public servants in cases of voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement: New binding jurisprudential precedent for Ecuador

This resolution specifically applies to public servants who retire (cease their duties) to benefit from retirement, as provided in Article 47 of the Organic Law of the Public Service (LOSEP)

1 9 10 11 12 13 24

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos