Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Superintendence of Personal Data Protection Issues Opinion on the Use of Biometric Data for Attendance Control

The Superintendence of Personal Data Protection has issued an opinion on Inquiry 002-2025, referenced in Official Letter No. SPDP-IRD-2025-0031-O, regarding the processing of biometric data for labor attendance control.

The authority establishes that explicit consent is required for the processing of biometric data in labor attendance control, and for consent to be considered valid, it must be free, specific, informed, and unequivocal.

Consent must be free, without coercion or undue pressure, and free from vices such as force or real fear, like the fear of losing one’s job. It must be specific, limited to a concrete purpose, and without ambiguity regarding its scope. Additionally, it must be informed, ensuring that the data subject clearly understands the purposes and conditions of the data processing. Finally, it must be unequivocal, expressed clearly and without doubt, ensuring that the data subject’s will is consciously expressed.

Regarding the involved parties:

  • Employers: They must ensure the consent of their workers before collecting biometric data and provide alternatives for those who do not wish to provide their data.
  • Workers: They may refuse the processing of their biometric data without it affecting their employment conditions and may request the deletion of their biometric data when applicable.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we advise companies and workers to ensure compliance with legal provisions and protect the rights to personal data security. Contact us for guidance on this important precedent and its impact in the labor field.

Más Artículos

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Quito Protege los Derechos de una Denominación de Origen registrada en la Unión Europea y la OMPI

Quevedo & Ponce actuó exitosamente en representación del Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA, ante una demanda presentada por una compañía ecuatoriana, en que se alegó principalmente que FONTINA no estaba registrada en Ecuador. Sin embargo, el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo con Sede en el Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, ratificó el acto administrativo impugnado, citando el riesgo de confusión para el consumidor y aplicando la Decisión 486 de la Comunidad Andina, destacando la importancia de proteger las denominaciones de origen, incluso sin un registro formal en Ecuador.

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

How to Protect Your Business from Litigation: Basic Legal Tips

Litigation can pose risks to your company’s resources and reputation. To prevent such risks, it is essential to adopt preventive measures, including drafting clear and comprehensive contracts, ensuring compliance with labor laws, safeguarding intellectual property, maintaining transparent accounting practices, engaging the services of a specialized attorney, and promoting internal conflict resolution. With appropriate legal counsel, you can protect your business and ensure its uninterrupted growth, free from legal disruptions.

Cómo Proteger Tu Empresa de Litigios: Consejos Legales Básicos

Cómo Proteger Tu Empresa de Litigios: Consejos Legales Básicos

Los litigios pueden poner en riesgo los recursos y la reputación de tu empresa. Para evitarlos, es fundamental tomar medidas preventivas como redactar contratos claros, cumplir con la legislación laboral, proteger la propiedad intelectual, mantener una contabilidad transparente, contar con un abogado especializado y fomentar la resolución interna de conflictos. Con la asesoría legal adecuada, puedes proteger tu negocio y asegurar su crecimiento sin interrupciones legales.

No hay bonificación por desahucio para los servidores públicos, en casos de retiro voluntario para acogerse a la jubilación: Nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio para Ecuador

No hay bonificación por desahucio para los servidores públicos, en casos de retiro voluntario para acogerse a la jubilación: Nuevo precedente jurisprudencial obligatorio para Ecuador

Esta resolución se aplica específicamente a los servidores públicos que se acogen al retiro (cesación de funciones) para beneficiarse de la jubilación, según lo dispuesto en el artículo 47 de la Ley Orgánica de Servicio Público (LOSEP).

No severance compensation for public servants in cases of voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement: New binding jurisprudential precedent for Ecuador

No severance compensation for public servants in cases of voluntary retirement to benefit from retirement: New binding jurisprudential precedent for Ecuador

This resolution specifically applies to public servants who retire (cease their duties) to benefit from retirement, as provided in Article 47 of the Organic Law of the Public Service (LOSEP)

1 26 27 28 29 30 41