Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales

Arbitration in Ecuador: An Effective Alternative for Dispute Resolution

Arbitration stands out as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that allows parties to resolve their conflicts outside of the ordinary court system, by resorting to impartial and qualified arbitrators who issue awards with the authority of a final judgment.

A cornerstone of arbitration is the parties’ autonomy of will, expressed through the arbitration agreement, which may be included as a clause within a contract or exist as an independent document. Notably, the nullity of the main contract does not affect the validity of the arbitration agreement, as it is deemed an autonomous accord. Pursuant to the kompetenz-kompetenz principle, the arbitral tribunal has the authority to rule on its own jurisdiction.

Arbitration offers significant advantages over traditional litigation:

  • Celerity: Arbitral proceedings are considerably faster, reducing procedural delays and bureaucracy.
  • Confidentiality: Unlike court litigation, arbitration is not public, safeguarding sensitive information and preserving business or personal relationships.
  • Expertise: Parties may appoint arbitrators with specialized knowledge in the subject matter, leading to more accurate and relevant decisions.

Arbitration thus provides a robust, modern, and efficient path for dispute resolution, ensuring legal certainty and procedural specialization.

At Quevedo & Ponce, we offer comprehensive arbitration advisory services, delivered by a highly specialized team committed to efficient, confidential, and client-focused solutions.

Más Artículos

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

IESS and Enforcement Actions: The Constitutional Court Shields Shareholders and Bans Administrative Travel Restrictions

Constitutional Court Ruling 3364-21-EP/25 protects shareholders from IESS enforcement measures, prohibiting administrative travel bans and personal liability without judicial intervention. The decision strengthens corporate legal certainty and upholds the binding precedent 22-13-IN/20

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

IESS y coactivas: la Corte Constitucional blinda a los accionistas y prohíbe arraigos administrativos

La Sentencia 3364-21-EP/25 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador redefine los límites de la coactiva del IESS, protegiendo a los accionistas frente a medidas arbitrarias. El fallo prohíbe que funcionarios administrativos dispongan arraigos o afectaciones patrimoniales sin intervención judicial, consolidando el respeto al precedente 22-13-IN/20 y fortaleciendo la seguridad jurídica corporativa.

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical Indications: Value and Protection of Origin

Geographical indications (GIs) are a form of intellectual property protection that recognizes the link between a product and its place of origin. They ensure that the product’s characteristics, quality, or goodwill derive from its geographic environment, helping preserve authenticity, strengthen the local economy, and protect the cultural heritage of communities.

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Indicaciones Geográficas: Valor y Protección del Origen

Las indicaciones geográficas (IG) son una forma de protección de la propiedad intelectual que reconoce el vínculo entre un producto y su lugar de origen. Garantizan que las características, calidad o reputación del producto provengan de su entorno geográfico, contribuyendo a preservar la autenticidad, fortalecer la economía local y proteger el patrimonio cultural de las comunidades.

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

Corporate Transformation and Sports Joint Stock Companies: Effects of the Constitutional Court Decision that Invalidated the Organic Law of National Solidarity

The Constitutional Court of Ecuador declared the total unconstitutionality of the Organic Law of National Solidarity, determining that it was enacted in violation of the principle of unity of subject matter and the ordinary legislative procedure. This decision nullifies the obligations imposed upon Simplified Stock Companies (S.A.S.) and Sports Joint Stock Companies (S.A.D.), restoring the previous regulatory framework and reaffirming both the supremacy of constitutional review and the need of maintaining normative coherence within the Ecuadorian legal system.

1 2 3 35

Contáctanos

Tienes alguna pregunta? Gustosos te ayudaremos