Quevedo & Ponce - Noticias Legales
Calling general meetings by email: A method in effect since 2022
- March 27th, 2025
- Quevedo & Ponce
Since 2022, the Regulations for General Meetings of Partners and Shareholders of Companies allow General Meetings to be called by email, a method that streamlines the call process and encourages greater shareholder participation. This change has replaced the traditional method of publication in the press, reducing costs and facilitating communication in a more agile manner.
Previously, the meeting took place in one of the highest circulated newspapers, which represented an additional expense and a slower process. With the new regulations, electronic call, which must be made at least five days in advance, is the main option. Companies can also incorporate other call methods depending on the provisions of their bylaws.
If a company’s bylaws establish the meeting by press, the law allows this provision to remain in place. However, if the company wishes to adopt email as the main means, it is necessary to amend its bylaws. This reform not only allows you to adapt to the new digital reality, but also significantly reduces the costs associated with publishing in print media.
Reforming the bylaws to include email as a method of convening meetings offers multiple benefits, such as resource optimization and greater accessibility for shareholders, which can increase their participation in making decision of the company.
If your company wishes to adapt its procedures for convening general meetings or amend its bylaws, at Quevedo & Ponce we have a team of attorneys specialized in corporate law to provide the necessary support and ensure compliance with current regulations.
Do not hesitate to contact us!
Más Artículos
WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge
The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge, adopted in 2024, establishes an international framework for the protection and recognition of ancestral knowledge. Through innovations such as the disclosure requirement, it promotes transparency in the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge in patented inventions, ensuring respect for the communities of origin.
Dissolution, Liquidation, and Cancellation of Commercial Companies in Ecuador
The dissolution, liquidation, and cancellation of commercial companies in Ecuador is a key process when a company ceases to operate, no longer generates income, or becomes unprofitable. Closure of the company in a timely manner prevents the accumulation of fiscal and administrative obligations, thereby reducing the risk of sanctions and unnecessary expenses. There are various legal options to perform this procedure, each suited to different circumstances.
Avoid Fines which rank from 2 to 20 Basic Salaries! – Gender Equality Plan for Companies in Ecuador
The Equality Plan must be registered before July 31, 2025, with the Ministry of Labor, or fines ranging from 2 to 20 basic salaries will be imposed on companies and public institutions that fail to comply with the law. This Plan ensures equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in the workplace, promoting inclusion and aiming to eliminate discrimination.
“Bimbo” Brand Rejected in Switzerland: The Importance of Cultural Perceptions in Trademark Registration
In the world of intellectual property, trademark protection involves not only legal aspects but also the social impact of the terms used. A recent case in Switzerland highlights how a trademark can be rejected if its name has immoral or insensitive connotations towards specific social groups.
Administrative Tribunal of Quito Protects the Rights of a Designation Of Origin Registered in the European Union and WIPO
Quevedo & Ponce successfully acted on behalf of the Consorzio Produttori e Tutela della DOP FONTINA in response to a lawsuit filed by an Ecuadorian company, which primarily argued that FONTINA was not registered in Ecuador. However, the Administrative Litigation Tribunal located in the Metropolitan District of Quito upheld the challenged administrative act, citing the risk of consumer confusion and applying Decision 486 of the Andean Community, emphasizing the importance of protecting designations of origin, even without formal registration in Ecuador.
